Encyclopedic Liberty. Jean Le Rond d'Alembert
Lübeck · Jaucourt
Machiavellianism (Machiavélisme) · Diderot
Manners (Manière) · Saint-Lambert
Masterpiece (Chef-d’Œuvre) · Diderot
Masterships (Maîtrises) · Faiguet de Villeneuve
Monarchy (Monarchie) · Jaucourt
[print edition page xv]
Natural Equality (Egalité Naturelle) · Jaucourt
Natural Law (Droit de la Nature) · Boucher d’Argis
Natural Liberty (Liberté Naturelle)
Natural Right (Droit Naturel) · Diderot
Political Arithmetic (Arithmétique Politique) · Diderot
Political Authority (Autorité Politique) · Diderot
Political Economy (Œconomie Politique) · Boulanger
Political Liberty (Liberté Politique) · Jaucourt
Public Corruption (Corruption Publique) · Diderot
Public Law (Droit Public) · Boucher d’Argis
Representatives (Représentans) · d’Holbach
Republic (République) · Jaucourt
Savings (Epargne) · Faiguet de Villeneuve
Slavery (Esclavage) · Jaucourt
State of Nature (Etat de Nature) · Jaucourt
Switzerland (Suisse) · Jaucourt
[print edition page xvi]
Temples of Liberty (Temples de la Liberté) · Jaucourt
Toleration (Tolérance) · Jaucourt
Trading Company (Compagnie de Commerce) · Véron de Forbonnais
Traffic in Blacks (Traite des Nègres) · Jaucourt
[print edition page xvii]
“Whoever takes the trouble of combining the several political articles, will find that they form a noble system of civil liberty.” So wrote the English legal expert Owen Ruffhead in 1768, referring to the seventeen-volume Encyclopédie, edited by Denis Diderot and Jean Le Rond d’Alembert, whose publication had been completed three years before.1 One volume per year had rolled off the presses from 1751 until 1757; the remaining ten volumes emerged all at once in 1765. The present anthology brings together as many of the politically themed articles as could comfortably fit within a single volume, so readers may decide for themselves whether a “noble system of civil liberty” or, indeed, any system at all emerges from them.
The worthiness of the project will be well known to students of the period. The editors described their compendium in terms that made clear their intention not only to provide a uniquely comprehensive reference work, but to “change the way men think,” to supply a “war machine” by which to overcome what they considered the entrenched, institutionalized resistance to new knowledge all around them. In his celebrated Preliminary Discourse, an introduction to the whole compilation, d’Alembert traced an entire history of modern philosophy and science designed to chart the way toward a sweeping Baconian project of improving the world through usable knowledge.2
And yet, for all the bold-sounding language that accompanied the prospectus and the first volume, the treatment of political subjects was problematic throughout the work’s publishing history. Diderot had already
[print edition page xviii]
spent some months