Genetic Disorders and the Fetus. Группа авторов
occur in spontaneous abortion, severe intrauterine growth retardation, and preeclampsia. They may originate from the placenta.563
Colony‐forming cells: morphology and nomenclature
Multiple approaches have been used to characterize and classify colony‐forming cell types. Specific antibodies to the intermediate filament components of the mammalian cell cytoskeleton564 provide the means for establishing tentative correlations between cell types in culture and their presumptive in vivo counterparts.565
A synopsis of the current classification of human AFCs in culture is provided in Table 3.7, which also summarizes criteria used for classification and the various nomenclatures to which they have led (for a more extensive compilation of the properties of AFCs, see the review by Gosden563). Morphologic criteria were applied first. They quickly led to the realization that a high degree of cytoplasmic and nuclear pleomorphism is the hallmark of cultured AFCs. In contrast to what is known from postnatally derived human skin fibroblast cultures, multinucleation is a frequent and distinctive feature of cultivated AFCs. One report describes 7 percent of AFCs having two nuclei and 1 percent showing three or more nuclei.566 Within the clonal progeny of a single AF specimen, considerably more cells appear to be of epithelial than fibroblast origin. A cell type that looks very much like a prototype fibroblast‐like cell at the individual cell level (Figure 3.4) was distinguished by Hoehn et al.556 from classic fibroblasts on the basis of its “bull's‐eye” colony pattern. Such a pattern is never observed with classic skin or embryonic lung fibroblasts. Figure 3.5 shows that the typical bull's‐eye colony pattern is displayed by epithelioid (E) and by AF‐type cells. The clonal pattern of F‐type cells exhibits a whorl‐like center and parallel arrays of spindle‐shaped cells. Since shapes of individual cells and clonal units are influenced by culture conditions, these features change during long‐term culture.567
Table 3.7 The classification of human second‐trimester amniotic fluid cells in culture (excluding RA cells)
| Reference | Melancon et al. 593 Gerbie et al. 594 | Sutherland et al.725 | Hoehn et al. 556, 588 | Priest et al. 566, 569, 571 | Virtanen et al. 583 | Cremer et al.584 Ochs et al. 587 |
| Criteria | Morphology, enzyme production | Morphology, growth behavior | Morphology, clone patterns, longevity, cytogenetics | Collagen and gonadotropin production, ultrastructure | IIF, intermediate filaments | Intermediate filaments, prokeratin peptides |
|
|
||||||
RA, rapidly adhering; AF, amniotic fluid‐specific; E, epithelioid; ED, epithelial and densely packed; 566 F, fibroblastoid; IIF, indirect immunofluorescence microscopy. Dotted lines indicate correspondence between the various nomenclatures (e.g. E3 corresponds to AF and E1).
See also review by Gosden. 563
Figure 3.4 Examples of living F‐, AF‐, and E‐type cells observed by phase‐contrast microscopy. Note the relative homogeneity of F‐type, in comparison to the pleomorphism of AF‐ and E‐type cells.
Figure 3.5 Examples of fixed colonies of F, AF and E clonal types at 2 weeks after plating. The AF‐ and E‐type colonies display typical “bull's‐eye” patterns. Compared with AF clones, the E‐type clones display wider growth margins around the darkly stained central core. The examples of AF and E clones are from primary platings of uncentrifuged amniotic fluid at 17 weeks gestational age. The F‐clone examples are subclones derived from a single F‐type primary clone isolated by a steel cloning cylinder and subsequent dilute plating on 2 × 3 inch glass slides. Crystal violet stain, 4/5 of actual size. Reproduced at 90 percent.
Biochemical characterization
The distinctiveness of the AFC types received support in a series of ultrastructural and cell secretion studies.566, 568–572 Hormones such as hCG, estrogen and progesterone are produced by AF‐type cells, some of which must originate from (placental) trophoblast tissue.572, 573 In contrast, F‐type AFCs failed to show hormone production, which is consistent with their likely mesenchymal origin.571, 574, 575 Human CVS cultures show higher levels of hCG secretion than AF‐type AFC cultures.576 Both AF‐ and F‐type AFCs express human lymphocyte antigen (HLA) class I (HLA‐ABC) but not class II (HLA‐DR) surface antigens.577
Extracellular matrix (ECM) studies and other work63, 578–580 defined a number of qualitative differences between AF‐ and F‐type AFCs. The differences in the types of procollagens produced were such that Bryant et al.581 could use these as markers in fusion studies involving AFCs and postnatally derived skin fibroblasts. Johnston et al.582 provided additional evidence for the distinctiveness of the AF cell type (Figure 3.6). Several polypeptide spots were qualitatively different among F and AF clones (see arrows in Figure 3.6). It furthermore provides convincing evidence for a close ontogenetic relationship between E and AF cells, since their two‐dimensional polypeptide patterns are nearly identical (see Figure 3.6).
Figure 3.6 Selected landscapes from two‐dimensional 35S‐methionine‐labeled