Why Are There Still Creationists?. Jonathan Marks
143
142 144
143 145
144 146
145 147
146 148
147 149
148 150
149 151
Why Are There Still Creationists?
Human Evolution and the Ancestors
Jonathan Marks
polity
Copyright © Jonathan Marks 2021
The right of Jonathan Marks to be identified as Author of this Work has been asserted in accordance with the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
First published in 2021 by Polity Press
Polity Press
65 Bridge Street
Cambridge CB2 1UR, UK
Polity Press
101 Station Landing
Suite 300
Medford, MA 02155, USA
All rights reserved. Except for the quotation of short passages for the purpose of criticism and review, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher.
ISBN-13: 978-1-5095-4748-7
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.
The publisher has used its best endeavours to ensure that the URLs for external websites referred to in this book are correct and active at the time of going to press. However, the publisher has no responsibility for the websites and can make no guarantee that a site will remain live or that the content is or will remain appropriate.
Every effort has been made to trace all copyright holders, but if any have been overlooked the publisher will be pleased to include any necessary credits in any subsequent reprint or edition.
For further information on Polity, visit our website: politybooks.com
Acknowledgments
This book was way too much fun to write. It was completed while I was a Director’s Fellow at the Notre Dame Institute for Advanced Study. I am very grateful to Brad Gregory, Meghan Sullivan, Don Stelluto, Carolyn Sherman, Kristian Olsen, and the rest of the NDIAS, for their support and collegiality. Parts of this book were presented in seminar there, and for participating in the stimulating and helpful discussion that followed, I thank Ani Aprahamian, Dylan Belton, Eileen Hunt Botting, Eric Bugyis, Fr. Terrence Ehrman, David Bentley Hart, Faisal Husain, Robert Latiff, Yulia Minets, Cara Ocobock, Matt Ravosa, Phillip Sloan, and Joshua Stuchlik.
For their especially valuable comments on the manuscript I thank Thomas Bolin, Neil Arner, and Sarah Morice Brubaker.
At UNC Charlotte I have benefitted from the wisdom of my co-instructor Joanne Maguire and my colleague Gregg Starrett. The lunchtime discussions with Mark Pizzato, Trevor Pearce, Bill Chu, Ron Lunsford, and Mike Corwin were also both fun and useful in shaping this book.
It has been a pleasure to interact with biblical scholars and theologians over the past few years, and I am particularly intellectually indebted to Celia Deane-Drummond and Agustín Fuentes and the other participants in their stimulating conference, “Humility, Wisdom, and Grace in Deep Time” back in 2017, which resulted in a wonderful volume called Theology and Evolutionary Anthropology. Thanks to my editor at Polity, Jonathan Skerrett, for seeing the manuscript through from beginning to end. Thanks to Karen Strier for decades of insights. For their encouraging notes and comments I thank the reviewers, especially Reviewer #1.
And as always, I am grateful for the support of my wife, Peta Katz, through the creative process and beyond.
Preface
There is a joke that goes, “What’s the difference between a biblical literalist and a kleptomaniac?” – “The biblical literalist takes things literally, and the kleptomaniac takes things, literally.”
The biblical literalist, however, also rejects what science says about where we came from, whereas the kleptomaniac, or at least the educated kleptomaniac, acknowledges that our bodies and genes are very similar to those of apes, and that a couple of million years ago in Africa, there were no people, but there were apes that had some key human features. The key features were small canine teeth, long thumbs, and a lower body that provided a range of movements like a human’s; that is to say, standing up, walking, and running.
A creationist is someone who accepts a literalist reading of the beginning of the Bible in lieu of the scientific narrative that our species has descended from other, earlier species over the course of hundreds of millions of years.1 There are of course many scholars who understand evolution, and science more generally, to refer to a set of secondary causes and processes, while simultaneously maintaining faith in a transcendent primary cause, who is in essence God-the-Evolver.2 Or, as theologian Sarah Coakley puts is, “God is that-without-which-there-would-be-no-evolution-at-all.”3 Whether life is ultimately meaningful is an interesting question, but not a scientific one – since science concerns itself with empirically based inferences, not with spiritual or moral propositions. At issue here is simply whether the origin of people involves apes as ancestors a few million years ago, as the comparative anatomical, genetic, and fossil evidence strongly seems to indicate.
Every generation of evolutionists, however, also inscribes their values into their science. That is not an adulteration of the science, but simply a consequence of being a cogitating social animal. Sometimes those values are sexist (see Charles Darwin’s Descent of Man, 1871), racist (see Ernst Haeckel’s History of Creation, 1876), cooperative (see Peter Kropotkin’s Mutual Aid, 1902), xenophobic (see Charles Davenport’s Heredity in Relation to Eugenics, 1911), colonialist (see William J. Sollas’s Ancient Hunters, 1911), egalitarian (see Theodosius Dobzhansky’s Mankind Evolving, 1961), hereditarian (see E. O. Wilson’s Sociobiology: The New Synthesis, 1975), or reductive (see Richard Dawkins’s The Selfish Gene, 1976).
Some scientists try to link their evolution to their atheism. That troubles me, because it makes a positive assertion – “God does not exist” – in the absence of appropriate scientific evidence and inference. Although that assertion is a reasonable hypothesis, I don’t think it is mandated by science.
So let me position myself. I am agnostic about God. I capitalize Him out of politeness and custom. But I do not know whether supernatural beings of any sort exist. If they do, that would be nice; and if they don’t, that also works. I find it difficult to believe that if they do exist, they would care whether or not I believe that they exist, when it would actually be very easy to convince me, if they really did exist and care. The only beings that I am aware of interacting with are the ones inhabiting the natural realm, not the supernatural.
I