Fixed Restorations. Irena Sailer
Dent Assoc 2006;137(supplement):32S–36S.
8. Williams D. On the mechanisms of biocompatibility. Biomaterials 2008;29:2941–2953.
9. Shahi S, Özcan M, Maleki Dizaj S, et al. A review on potential toxicity of dental material and screening their biocompatibility. Toxicol Mech Methods 2019;29:368–377.
10. Wataha JC. Predicting clinical biological responses to dental materials. Dent Mater 2012;28:23–40.
11. Schmalz G, Galler KM. Biocompatibility of biomaterials – lessons learned and considerations for the design of novel materials. Dent Mater 2017;33:382–393.
12. Paravina RD, Kimura M, Powers JM. Blending effect of composites related to restoration size. Dent Mater 2006;22:299–301.
13. Han JM, Zhang H, Choe HS, Lin H, Zheng G, Hong G. Abrasive wear and surface roughness of contemporary dental composite resin. Dent Mater J 2014;33:725–732.
14. Schepke U, Meijer HJ, Vermeulen KM, Raghoebar GM, Cune MS. Clinical bonding of resin nano ceramic restorations to zirconia abutments: a case series within a randomized clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2016;18:984–992.
15. Zimmermann M, Koller C, Reymus M, Mehl A, Hickel R. Clinical evaluation of indirect particle-filled composite resin CAD/CAM partial crowns after 24 months. J Prosthodont 2018;27:694–699.
16. Hu M, Weiger R, Fischer J. Comparison of two test designs for evaluating the shear bond strength of resin composite cements. Dent Mater 2016;32:223–232.
17. Schwenter J, Schmidli F, Weiger R, Fischer J. Adhesive bonding to polymer infiltrated ceramic. Dent Mater J 2016;35:796–802.
18. Rohr N, Flury A, Fischer J. Efficacy of a universal adhesive on the bond strength of resin composite cements to polymer-infiltrated ceramic. J Adhes Dent 2017;19:417–424.
19. Sailer I, Makarov NA, Thoma DS, Zwahlen M, Pjetursson BE. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: single crowns (SCs). Dent Mater 2015;31:603–623. Erratum in: Dent Mater 2016 Dec; 32:e389–e390.
20. Della Bona A. Bonding to Ceramics: Scientific Evidences for Clinical Dentistry. São Paulo, Brazil: Artes Medicas; 2009.
21. Höland W, Schweiger M, Frank M, Rheinberger V. A comparison of the microstructure and properties of the IPS Empress 2 and the IPS Empress glass-ceramics. Biomed Mater Res 2000;53:297–303.
22. Yin L, Song XF, Qu SF, Han YG, Wang H. Surface integrity and removal mechanism in simulated dental finishing of a feldspathic porcelain. Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2006;79:365–378.
23. Barchetta NF, Amaral M, Prochnow C, et al. Strength of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic: acid-etching time and resin cement application effects. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2019;39:431–437.
24. D’Arcangelo C, Vanini L, Rondoni GD, De Angelis FJ. Wear properties of dental ceramics and porcelains compared with human enamel. Prosthet Dent 2016;115:350–355.
25. Sun Q, Chen L, Tian L, Xu B. Single-tooth replacement in the anterior arch by means of a cantilevered IPS e.max Press veneer-retained fixed partial denture: case series of 35 patients. Int J Prosthodont 2013;26:181–187.
26. Rabel K, Spies BC, Pieralli S, Vach K, Kohal RJ. The clinical performance of all-ceramic implant-supported single crowns: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018;29 Suppl 18:196–223.
27. Pjetursson BE, Valente NA, Strasding M, Zwahlen M, Liu S, Sailer I. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic single crowns. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018;29 Suppl 16:199–214.
28. Zhang Y, Lawn BR. Novel zirconia materials in dentistry. J Dent Res 2018;97:140–147.
29. Filser F, Lüthy H, Schärer P, Gauckler L. All-ceramic restorations by new direct ceramic machining process (DCM). J Dent Res 1998;77:762 (spec. issue B, abstract no. 1046).
30. Maziero Volpato CA, D’Altoé Garbelotto LG, Fredel MC, Bondioli F. Application of zirconia in dentistry: biological, mechanical and optical considerations. In: Sikalidis C (ed). Advances in Ceramics – Electric and Magnetic Ceramics, Bioceramics, Ceramics and Environment. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech, 2011;397–420.
31. Heintze SD, Rousson V. Survival of zirconia- and metalsupported fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont 2010;23:493–502.
32. Sailer I, Strasding M, Valente NA, Zwahlen M, Liu S, Pjetursson BE. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic multiple-unit fixed dental prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018;29 Suppl 16:184–198.
33. Pjetursson BE, Sailer I, Makarov NA, Zwahlen M, Thoma DS. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part II: multiple-unit FDPs. Dent Mater 2015;31:624–639. Erratum in: Dent Mater 2017;33: e48–e51.
34. O’Keefe KL, Strickler ER, Kerrin HK. Color and shade matching: the weak link in esthetic dentistry. Compendium 1990;11:116–120.
35. Sproull RC. Color matching in dentistry. Part III. Color control. J Prosthet Dent 1974;31:146–154.
Patient-related factors for material selection
In this chapter: