Digital Health Communications. Группа авторов
other side of a digital community link whose social logic has yet to be widely explored in the health sector.
P.7. And finally, how can we take care of digital workers?
To conclude this overview of digital communication in health from the point of view of ICS, we would like to reiterate that the digital is itself considered a major health issue, especially at work [BOU 15a]. The idea here could be similar to the perspectives opened up by Bernard Stiegler in his pharmacology of the digital world [STI 06], where online practices are both a remedy for many informational and relational deficiencies, as well as a social poison. The aim here is to understand the psycho-sociological risks linked in particular to what we could define as “connective burn-out”. Some researchers in the field therefore favor the term techno-sociological risks (TSR) such as
all the physical and psychological disorders incurred by an employee, as soon as he or she becomes part of a work situation where information and communication technologies (ICT) play a central role in the accomplishment of his or her missions. [OLI 19]
In the case of a strong dematerialization of the activity in what is commonly today called digital labor [CAR 15], workers, whether they are members of the “pronetariat” according to the terminology of the futurologist Joël de Rosnay [DER 06] or representatives of a hyper-connected management [CAR 17a, CAR 19], suffer from the impossibility of extracting themselves from the platformized digital pressure (e.g. in the case of self-employed workers who have been uberized and enslaved by the uninterrupted process of online orders) or managerial (e.g. the obligation for a community manager to remain on the lookout for posts that negatively affect the image of his or her employer on social networks) [HAS 19].
P.8. Diagnosis and treatment
Digital technology continues to transform our society. It is even helped by a completely organic virus. An unlikely alliance, but how terribly effective. We now leave you with this book and these explorations to continue thinking about the changes that are taking place.
Olivier: “We’ll talk again to write the introduction, but now I have to leave you. I have a call about one of my students’ thesis.”
Benoit: “Excellent. That gives me a few moments to prepare for my videoconference consultation with my proctologist. See you tomorrow!”
Olivier GALIBERT
University Burgundy Franche-Comté
Benoit CORDELIER
University of Quebec in Montreal (UQAM)
Dijon/Montreal, March 2021
P.9. References
[AMB 18] AMBROSINI C.-F., La communication hospitalière publique à l’ère digitale, Information and Communication Sciences Thesis, Université de Nice Sophia Antipolis, Nice, 2018.
[ARR 13] ARRUABARRENA B., QUETTIER P., “Des rituels de l’automesure numérique à la fabrique autopoïétique de soi”, Les Cahiers du numérique, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 41–62, 2013.
[BAD 15] BADULESCU C., “La communication numérique en terrain sensible”, Questions de communication, no. 28, pp. 81–100, 2015.
[BAZ 08] BAZET I., JOLIVET A., MAYERE A., “Pour une approche communicationnelle du travail d’organisation : changement organisationnel et gestion des événements indésirables”, Communication & Organisation, no. 33, pp. 30–39, 2008.
[BER 14] BÉRANGER J., BOUADI R., “Approche éthico-juridique de l’usage des données médicales à caractère personnel”, Les Cahiers du numérique, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 93–123, 2014.
[BON 05] BONNET J., “Interprofessionnalité et complexité : une tentative de compréhension et d’articulation des cultures et des pratiques professionnelles liées à la santé”, in AUBERT M. (ed.), Interprofessionnalité en gérontologie, Érès, Toulouse, 2005.
[BON 13] BONACCORSI J., “Chapitre 6 – Approches sémiologiques du web”, in BARATS C. (ed.), Manuel d’analyse du web en Sciences Humaines et Sociales, Armand Colin, Paris, 2013.
[BOU 03] BOURRET C., “La santé en réseaux”, Études, vol. 399, no. 9, pp. 175–189, 2003.
[BOU 10] BOUQUILLION P., MATTHEWS J.-T., Le web collaboratif mutations des industries de la culture et de la communication, Presses universitaires de Grenoble, Grenoble, 2010.
[BOU 12] BOUQUILLION P., Creative economy, creative industries : des notions à traduire, Presses universitaires de Vincennes, Saint-Denis, 2012.
[BOU 15a] BOUDOKHANE-LIMA F., FELIO C., “Les usages professionnels des TIC : des régulations à construire”, Communication & Organisation, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 139–150, 2015.
[BOU 15b] BOUVILLE G., TREMPE C., “La mise en place du lean management. Un bouleversement de l’univers hospitalier ?”, in FERMON B. (ed.), Performance et innovation dans les établissements de santé, Dunod, Paris, 2015.
[CAR 01a] CARRÉ D., “À la frontière du marchand et du non marchand. Place des téléservices dans la réorganisation du secteur de la santé”, Études de communication, vol. 23, no. 1, p. 3, 2001.
[CAR 01b] CARRÉ D., LACROIX J.G., La santé et les autoroutes de l’information. La greffe informatique, L’Harmattan, Paris, 2001.
[CAR 15] CARDON D., CASILLI A., Qu’est-ce que le digital labor ? INA, Bry-sur Marne, 2015.
[CAR 17a] CARAYOL V., La laisse électronique : les cadres débordés par les TIC, MSHA, Pessac, 2017.
[CAR 17b] CARDOSO S., BOURDAA M., “Design et transmedia : projet, expérience usager, worldbuilding au cœur des disciplines SHS”, Revue française des sciences de l’information et de la communication, no. 10 [Accessed 23 April 2020], 2017.
[CAR 19] CARAYOL V., LABORDE A., “Les organisations malades du numérique”, Communication & Organisation, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 11–17, 2019.
[CHA 90] CHAMPAGNE P., Faire l’opinion le nouveau jeu politique, Éditions de Minuit, Paris, 1990.
[CHE 19] CHERBA M., THOËR C., TURBIDE O. et al., “Le soutien social en ligne comme mode d’intervention psychosociale : revue de littérature, pistes de recherche et recommandations pour les intervenants”, Santé Publique, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 83–92, 2019.
[CLA 19] CLAVIER V., “La place de l’information dans les pratiques professionnelles des diététiciennes : au croisement des missions d’éducation, de prévention et de soin”, I2D – Information, données & documents, pp. 114–133, 2019.
[COH 06] COHENDET P., CREPLET F., DUPOUËT O., La gestion des connaissances firmes et communautés de savoir, Économica, Paris, 2006.
[COR 13] CORDELIER B., “Mise en invisibilité des individus et reconnaissance des activités”, Communication et organisation, no. 44, pp. 29–40, 2013.
[DEG 14] DE GAULEJAC V., La société malade de la gestion idéologie gestionnaire, pouvoir managérial et harcèlement social, Le Seuil, Paris, 2014.
[DER 06] DE ROSNAY J., La révolte du pronétariat, Fayard, Paris, 2006.
[DUR 09] DURAMPART M., “Les TIC dans les organisations : des partenaires difficiles à contrôler”, Hermès, La Revue, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 221–227, 2009.
[EVI 02] EVIN C., Les droits des usagers du système de santé, Berger-Levrault, Paris, 2002.
[FLI 10] FLICHY P., Le sacre de l’amateur sociologie des passions ordinaires à l’ère numérique, Le Seuil, Paris, 2010.