The Unsettling Outdoors. Russell Hitchings
L., Atchison, J., Phillips, C. et al. (2017). Vegetal Politics: Belonging, Practices and Places. London: Routledge.
33 Hinchliffe, S. (2007). Geographies of Nature: Societies, Environments, Ecologies. London: Sage.
34 Hoyle, H. Hitchmough, J., and Jorgensen, A. (2017). All about the ‘wow factor’? The relationships between aesthetics, restorative effect and perceived biodiversity in designed urban planting. Landscape and Urban Planning 164: 109–123.
35 Huang, Q., Yang, M., Jane, H.-A. et al. (2020). Trees, grass, or concrete? The effects of different types of environments on stress reduction. Landscape and Urban Planning 193: 103654.
36 Hui, A., Schatzki, T., and Shove, E. (2017). The Nexus of Practices: Connections, Constellations, and Practitioners. London: Routledge.
37 Ingold, T. (2004). Culture on the ground: the world perceived through the feet. Journal of Material Culture 9: 315–340.
38 Jones, O. (2009). After nature: entangled worlds. In: A Companion to Environmental Geography (ed. N. Castree, D. Demeritt, D. Liverman et al.), 294–312. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
39 Jones, O. and Cloke, P. (2002). Tree Cultures: The Place of Trees and Trees in their Place. Oxford: Berg.
40 Jorgensen, A. (2011). Beyond the view: future directions in landscape aesthetics research. Landscape and Urban Planning 100: 353–355.
41 Kaika, M. (2004). Interrogating the geographies of the familiar: domesticating nature and constructing the autonomy of the modern home. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 28: 265–286.
42 Kaplan, R. (1993). The role of nature in the context of the workplace. Landscape and Urban Planning 26: 193–201.
43 Kaplan, R. and Kaplan, S. (1989). The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
44 Kaplan, R., Kaplan, S., and Ryan, R. (1998). With People in Mind: Design and Management of Everyday Nature. Washington, DC: Island Press.
45 Kellert, S. (2002). Experiencing nature: affective, cognitive, and evaluative development in children. In: Children and Nature: Psychological, Sociocultural, and Evolutionary Investigations (ed. P. Kahn and S. Kellert), 117–151. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46 Kellert, S. and Wilson, E.O. (1993). The Biophilia Hypothesis. Washington: Island Press.
47 Keniger, L., Gaston, K., Irvine, K. et al. (2013). What are the benefits of interacting with nature? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 10: 913–935.
48 Krenichyn, K. (2004). Women and physical activity in an urban park: enrichment and support through an ethic of care. Journal of Environmental Psychology 24: 117–130.
49 Krzywoszynska, A. (2019). Caring for soil life in the Anthropocene: the role of attentiveness in more‐than‐human ethics. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 44: 661–675.
50 Kuo, F. and Sullivan, W. (2001). Environment and crime in the inner city: does vegetation reduce crime? Environment and Behavior 33: 343–367.
51 Larson, L., Szczytko, R., Bowers, E. et al. (2018). Outdoor time, screen time, and connection to nature: troubling trends among rural youth? Environment and Behavior 51: 966–991.
52 Lin, B., Fuller, R., Bush, R. et al. (2014). Opportunity or orientation? Who uses urban parks and why. PLoS ONE 9 (1): e87422.
53 Lorimer, J. (2008). Counting corncrakes: the affective science of the UK corncrake census. Social Studies of Science 38: 377–405.
54 Louv, R. (2005). Last Child in the Woods: Saving Our Children from Nature-Deficit Disorder. New York: Algonquin Books.
55 Maller, C. (2019). Healthy Urban Environments: More-than-human Theories. London: Routledge.
56 Martin, L., Pahl, S., White, M. et al. (2019). Natural environments and craving: the mediating role of negative affect. Health and Place 58: 102160.
57 Meyer-Grandbastien, A., Burel, F., Hellier, E. et al. (2020). A step towards understanding the relationship between species diversity and psychological restoration of visitors in urban green spaces using landscape heterogeneity. Landscape and Urban Planning 195: 103728.
58 Moore, E. (1981). A prison environment’s effect on health care service demands. Journal of Environmental Systems 11: 17–34.
59 Morris, A. (2019). Educational landscapes and the environmental entanglement of humans and non‐humans through the starling murmuration. Geographical Journal 185: 303–312.
60 Navarrete-Hernandez, P. and Laffan, K. (2019). A greener urban environment: designing green infrastructure interventions to promote citizens’ subjective wellbeing. Landscape and Urban Planning 191: 103618.
61 Pergams, O. and Zaradic, P. (2006). Is love of nature in the US becoming love of electronic media? 16-year downtrend in national park visits explained by watching movies, playing video games, internet use, and oil prices. Journal of Environmental Management 80: 387–393.
62 Phillips, C. and Atchison, J. (2018). Seeing the trees for the (urban) forest: more-than-human geographies and urban greening. Australian Geographer 51: 155–168.
63 Pretty, J., Peacock, J., Sellens, M. et al. (2005). The mental and physical health outcomes of green exercise. International Journal of Environmental Health Research 15: 319–337.
64 Pyle, R. (1993). The Thunder Tree: Lessons from an Urban Wildland. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
65 Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices: a development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory 5: 243–263.
66 Robbins, P. (2019). Scientific opportunities in the great entanglement. Geographical Review 109: 252–257.
67 Schatzki, T. (1996). Social Practices: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
68 Shove, E. (2003). Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience: The Social Organisation of Normality. Oxford: Berg.
69 Shove, E. and Pantzar, M. (2007). Recruitment and reproduction: the careers of and carriers of digital photography and floorball. Human Affairs 17: 154–167.
70 Shove, E., Pantzar, M., and Watson, M. (2012). The Dynamics of Social Practice. London: Sage.
71 Skår, M. (2010). Forest dear and forest fear: dwellers’ relationships to their neighbourhood forest. Landscape and Urban Planning 98: 110–116.
72 Soga, M. and Gaston, K. (2016). Extinction of experience: the loss of human–nature interactions. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 14: 94–101.
73 Summit, J. and Sommer, R. (1999). Further studies of preferred tree shapes. Environment and Behavior 31: 550–576.
74 Turner, W., Nakamura, T., and Dinetti, M. (2004). Global urbanization and the separation of humans from nature. BioScience 54: 585.
75 Ulrich, R. (1983). View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science: 420–421.
76 Ulrich, R., Simons, R., and Losito, B. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology 11: 201–230.
77 Van den Berg, A., Hartig, T., and Staats, H. (2007). Preference for nature in urbanized societies: stress, restoration and the pursuit of sustainability. Journal of Social Issues 63: 79–96.
78 Vannini, P. and Taggart, J. (2015). Solar energy, bad weather days, and the temporalities of slower homes. Cultural Geographies 22: 637–657.
79 Ward Thompson, C. Aspinall, P. Roe, J. et al. (2016). Mitigating stress and supporting health in deprived urban communities: the importance of green space and the social environment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 13: 440.
80 Ward Thompson, C. (2002). Urban open spaces in the 21st century. Landscape and Urban Planning 60: 59–72.
81 Warde, A., Cheng, S.-L., Olsen, W. et al. (2007). Changes in the practice of eating: comparative analysis