Mesoamerican Archaeology. Группа авторов
315
335 316
336 317
337 318
338 319
339 320
340 321
341 322
342 323
343 324
344 325
345 326
346 327
347 328
348 329
349 330
350 331
351 332
352 333
353 334
354 335
355 336
356 337
357 338
358 339
359 340
360 341
361 342
362 343
363 344
364 345
365 346
366 347
367 348
368 349
369 350
370 351
371 352
372 353
373 354
374 355
375 356
376 357
377 358
378 359
379 360
380 361
381 362
382 363
383 364
384 365
385 366
386 367
387 368
388 369
389 370
390 371
391 372
392 373
393 374
394 375
395 376
396 377
397 378
398 379
399 380
400 381
401 382
402 383
403 384
404 385
405 386
406 387
407 388
408 389
409 390
410 391
411 392
412 393
413 394
414 395
415 396
416 397
417 398
418 399
419 400
420 401
421 402
422 403
423 404
424 405
425 406
Preface
In the 17 years since the first edition of Mesoamerican Archaeology: Method and Theory was published, our goal of providing theoretically sophisticated and data-rich explorations of important topics for a nonspecialist reader, written by the researchers themselves, has proved successful. When approached by Wiley-Blackwell to edit a second edition, the original coeditors, Julia A. Hendon and Rosemary A. Joyce, agreed that the chance to incorporate new research by an international array of scholars was not to be missed. The first move was to add Lisa Overholtzer as editor. The three of us approached some authors from the first edition who agreed to update or rewrite their chapters. We then invited new contributors whose work reflects current research trends in Mesoamerican archaeology. For this edition we purposefully included a chapter on bioarchaeology and three chapters that include the Colonial period in their discussions.
As with the first edition, this book is intended to be useful for anyone teaching Mesoamerican archaeology, whether as the sole subject of a course or as one case study among others in courses dealing with archaeology of the Americas, complex societies, or other topics. We also expect that it will be of interest to any reader who wants a sample of contemporary research on the major time periods and societies that are the focus of Mesoamerican archaeology. Because this book is a departure from other models for introductory texts, it is appropriate for us to briefly explain what it is and is not and to suggest how we hope it might be incorporated into the classroom. All three of us teach material from the field of Mesoamerican archaeology in basic introductory courses and more advanced offerings. As active researchers who each have developed and led our own field projects, we find ourselves struggling to provide students with a sense of the research process. In particular, we think it is important for students to see that changes in archaeological understanding (or differences in opinion, as illustrated by some of the essays included here) are a constructive part of the research process. They reflect the mechanisms through which our discipline debates explanations, puts them to the test against existing and new data, and gradually revises them. Too often, we find that students (and people outside the academy interested in archaeology) have the impression, especially from media coverage, that changes in interpretation result from violent rejection of earlier ideas, represented as poorly conceived, foolish, or examples of bad work. We do not think that representing archaeology as a kind of winner-takes-all contest is very true to the reality of the constant hard work, only occasionally accompanied by moments of transformative insight, that we do as field researchers. Nor does the metaphor of a contest accurately represent the way that new research builds on and acknowledges older ideas, even in the process of modifying, extending, or disagreeing with those ideas.
We have each found that our teaching is most successful when we base it on