Renewable Energy for Sustainable Growth Assessment. Группа авторов
The indicator’s values and range were estimated from substantial available literature [32, 35, 48, 60–83]. The present study assigned equal weightage to all indicators assuming that all indicators are equally important for sustainable development.
Table 2.2 Summary of selected indicators.
| Indicators | Type | Unit | Optimization preference |
| Efficiency (I1) | Technological | Percentage | max-m |
| Response to peak demand (I2) | Technological | Qualitative (1-5) | max-m |
| Capacity factor (I3) | Technological | Percentage | max-m |
| LCOE (I4) | Economic | USD/KWh | min-m |
| Service life (I5) | Economic | Years | max-m |
| Land use (I6) | Environmental | m2/MWh | min-m |
| GHG emissions (I7) | Environmental | g CO2-eq/KWh | min-m |
| Social acceptance (I8) | Social | Qualitative (1-5) | max-m |
| Social risks (I9) | Social | Qualitative (1-5) | min-m |
| Environmental risks (I10) | Social | Qualitative (1-5) | min-m |
2.4.3 Methodology
2.4.3.1 The TOPSIS Method
The TOPSIS is a well-known MCDM method. The concept on which this method is based is the distance of alternatives from best solution [84]. Accordingly, the most suitable alternative will be nearest from the best solution and far away from the worst solution [85, 86]. The best solution is one which maximizes the beneficial indicators and minimizes the non-beneficial indicators.
The steps of the TOPSIS method are described as follows:
a. A decision matrix wherein columns represent indicators (I1, I2, I3, …, In), (j = 1, 2, …, n) and rows represent alternatives (A1, A2, A3, . . . Am), (i = 1, 2, …, m) has to be established.(2.1)Table 2.3 Indicators value for each technology with range in brackets.RE technologyEfficiency (I1)Respond to peak demand (I2)Capacity factor (I3)LCOE (I4)Service life (I5)Land use (I6)GHG emissions (I7)Social acceptance (I8)Social risks (I9)Environmental risks (I10)Large hydropower80 [80-95]5 [4-5]45 [35-56]0.047 [0.044-0.049]50 [30-80]160 [2-750]18.5 [2-75]1 [1-2]5 [4-5]5 [4-5]Small hydropower80 [70-90]1 [1-2]45 [34-56]0.06 [0.02-0.10]35 [30-60]0.5 [.003-1]5 [0.3-13]3 [2-4]3 [2-4]3 [2-4]Solar PV15 [15-18]1 [1-2]18 [14-18]0.062 [0.045-.068]25 [20-35]20 [1-64]48 [9-300]5 [4-5]1 [1-2]2 [2-3]Onshore wind power35 [30-40]1 [1-2]25 [20-32]0.05 [0.033-0.083]25 [20-25]100 [72-137]11 [7-124]5 [4-5]2 [1-2]1 [1-2]Bioenergy50 [35-60]3 [3-4]64 [40-85]0.057 [0.04-0.09]20 [20-30]900 [72-2200]230 [14-1000]4 [3-5]3 [2-4]4 [3-5]An element Xij in Eq. (2.1) represents the value of the ith alternative Ai, for the jth indicator Ij.
b. The normalization of decision matrix as presented by rij is shown below(2.2)
c. The rij is now multiplied to respective weights (Wj) of indicators to obtain the matrix vij as calculated in Eq. (2.3).(2.3)Wj in Eq. (2.3) is the corresponding weight of the indicator
d. The best solution (V+) and worst solutions (V−) is then calculated as shown in below equations:(2.4)(2.5)J is the set of beneficiary indicators and j’ is of non-beneficiary indicators.
e. The distance of separation of each alternative from the best and the worst solution is calculated as:(2.6)(2.7)
f. The corresponding closeness of the alternative Aij from the best solution is calculated as:(2.8)
g. Finally, according the value of Ri in descending order the alternatives are ranked.
2.4.3.2 The Fuzzy-TOPSIS
The fuzzy-TOPSIS, a well-known MCDM method, was developed by [87]. Fuzzy-TOPSIS is extensively used in the various fields for ranking where decision makers give judgement in the form of crisp value especially for qualitative indicators. In qualitative approaches, the decisions are usually expressed in the form of linguistic terms (e.g., low, high, very high), and due to the possibility of vagueness in a human decision, uncertainty is always associated with the result. Fuzzy combined with the MCDM method has proven to be useful in handling qualitative indicators with associated uncertainties [53, 54].
Before elaborating the steps of fuzzy-TOPSIS. The basic theory of fuzzy is explained as follows:
(i) The membership function for a triangular fuzzy number à given by (a1, b1, c1) is defined as:(2.9)
(ii) The distance between two triangular fuzzy numbers à = (a1, b1, c1) and is given by Eq. (2.10):(2.10)
(iii) The multiplication of fuzzy triangular numbers is given by Eq. (2.11):(2.11)
(iv) The addition of fuzzy triangular numbers is given by Eq. (2.12):(2.12)
Based on the basic fuzzy theory explained above. The fuzzy-TOPSIS method steps are described as below:
1 (a) Establish a decision matrix choosing the linguistic values for alternatives (i = 1, 2, … m) with respect to indicator (j = 1, 2,…n).
2 (b) Choose the suitable linguistic variables for the weights of the indicators.
3 (c) The fuzzy linguistic value are in range of [0, 1]; thus, normalization is not required.
4 (d)