A History of the French Novel. Volume 2. To the Close of the 19th Century. Saintsbury George
for which reasons could perhaps be given. And it certainly does not apply to Balzac.
128
He was now forty-four, and had published not a few volumes, mostly small, of other kinds – travel description (which he did uncommonly well), and miscellaneous writing, and criticism, including the famous
129
As for instance, those from Dekker and Massiger; Camoens and Ercilla are allowed their native tongues "neat."
130
The actual "Chartreuse" of Parma only makes its appearance on the very last page of the book, when the hero, resigning his arch bishopric, retires to it.
131
He is the younger son of a rich and noble family, but his father disowns and his older brother denounces him quite early. It is characteristic of Beyle that we hear very little of the father and are practically never even introduced to the brother.
132
These four words somehow make me think of Samuel Newcome's comment on the unfortunate dinner where "Farintosh" did not appear: "Scarcely anything was drank."
133
See note above.
134
Both would have declined to meddle with her, I think, but for different reasons.
135
Beyle, who had himself no good looks, is particularly lavish of them to his heroes.
136
Perhaps one of the rare biographical details which, as has been explained, may "force the
137
This bad bloodedness, or κακοηθεια, of Beyle's heroes is really curious. It would have qualified them later to be Temperance fanatics or Trade Union demagogues. The special difference of all three is an intense dislike of somebody else "having something."
138
In that merry and wise book
139
She keeps the anniversary of his execution, and imitates Marguerite in procuring and treasuring, at the end of the story, Julien's severed head. (It may be well to note that Dumas had not yet written
140
In proper duel, of course; not as he shot his mistress.
141
Its great defect is the utter absence of any poetical element. But, as Mérimée (than whom there could hardly be, in this case, a critic more competent or more friendly) said, poetry was, to Beyle,
142
It seems curiously enough, that Beyle did mean to make the book
143
This attraction of the
144
145
A pseudonymous person has "reconstituted" the story under the title of
146
It may be desirable to glance at Beyle's avowed or obvious "intentions" in most if not all his novels – in the
147
Vide
148