Biotron is the key to human health. The use of concentrated radiation of young organisms for health improvement and prolongation of active life. Evgeny Komrakov
one side next to the bed. The first EKOM Biotron under patent was built in 2010 in the city of Perm (Russia). Figure 6 shows the last EKOM Biotron of this design, which was built in Vietnam in 2018. The dimensions of the EKOM Biotron chamber were 4x4 meters. Due to the use of two reflectors, many times more plants, and a two-sided focal zone, the efficiency of the EKOM Biotron of this design was about 15 times more efficient than Jiang’s Biotron. This made it possible to use the EKOM Biotron without an amplifier and do courses of 12 sessions with a session duration of 1 hour.
The strange color of the EKOM Biotron lighting is due to the fact that the activity of the main parameters of plant growth peaks in areas of blue and red light (Fig. 6A). The most effective is a mixture – blue 25% and red 75%. Now special LED phytolamps and phytolents are being produced. In 2010, they were not released and had to make lighting consisting of 2 red and one blue LED strip.
The first two EKOM Biotrons were made of copper, as well as Jiang’s Biotron. Then, both EKOM Biotrons and compact Biotrons were made of aluminum. This is due to the reflective properties of the metal. The radiation of plants was discovered by the Russian scientist Alexander Gurvich in 1923. To put it simply, he did experiments with onions. When two bulbs were next to each other and one of them was infected with rot, then the second bulb was infected with rot. When two bulbs were hermetically separated by glass, no infection occurred. When two bulbs were hermetically separated by quartz glass, infection occurred. From this, Gurvich concluded that there is information interaction between the bulbs through radiation in the ultraviolet (UV) range, which was later confirmed. Gurvich called the detected radiation mitogenetic. Jiang said that the best metal for Biotrons is gold, silver is possible, and copper is possible. However, judging by the graph of the reflectivity of different metals (Fig. 7), hard UV with wavelengths from 100 to 250 nanometers effectively reflects only aluminum. Neither gold, silver, nor copper in this range effectively reflect UV.
Plants and other young organisms that can be used as donors in Biotrons emit not only in the UV range. They can emit both in the infrared (IR) and terahertz ranges, UHF, microwave and even in ultrasound. In these ranges, copper, like aluminum, works well. But when using copper, the UV range is lost.
How is the volumetric focal zone of the Biotron formed?
The basic idea of all EKOM Biotrons is that the reflectors are installed at a distance of the radius of their curvature. This makes it possible to form a joint focal zone in the center of the device, where the person lies. An example of such a device is shown in Figure 8.
The area of each reflector is only 0.6 m2. And in reality, many hundreds of square meters of reflectors work on the formation of the focal zone. This section describes exactly how it works.
Figure 9 shows a part of the sphere and the optical axis OP from its center. Parallel to this optical axis, a beam AB is drawn at a distance of a. The greater the distance a, the closer point F is to the sphere (the angle of incidence is equal to the angle of reflection).
If we take several parallel rays, they will form a line on the optical axis from point R/2 to point F with a length that depends on the distance a. The length of this line can be accurately calculated depending on the distance a and the radius R of the sphere by the formula:
This formula and its conclusion are given in the description of the patent RU 2533058 (Komrakov, 2012). The maximum distance a for the EKOM Biotron is 1500 mm, and for the Jiang Biotron 800 mm (half the length of the stand with plants). The estimated length of the focal line from point R/2 to point F will be 16 cm for the EKOM Biotron, and 13 cm for the Jiang Biotron.
The formation of such a line from point R/2 to point F is called “spherical aberration”. Spherical aberration is a serious drawback in most devices related to energy concentration. However, in the case of a Biotron, spherical aberration is a significant ADVANTAGE, since it allows you to form a volumetric focal zone with a size comparable to the zone of location of all major human organs. If we consider, for example, a parabola instead of a sphere, then it will form a focus at one point, and not a focal line. And this is a big disadvantage for Biotron. In addition, the parabola has a huge disadvantage due to the fact that it’s only one main optical axis and radiation only parallel to this axis will concentrate. The rest will dissipate. In the sphere, this is not the case at all, but more on that below.
In Figure 10, we have added a few more elements. Imagine a stream of rays parallel to the optical axis OR. In the vast majority of devices used in the world, such a stream comes from an infinitely remote point source (communications, radar, optics). It’s a classic. However, a Biotron is not a classic and the same stream of parallel rays is formed from a stand with plants (shown in green), which is installed in the opening of a spherical reflector, of course with some distortions due to the close distance of the distributed source from the reflector, which will lead to a certain decrease in the quality of concentration, which is even useful for Biotron technology, where it is necessary to create a volumetric focal zone. All plants available on the stand in a Large Biotron (Fig. 6), of which approximately 250 thousand, radiating parallel to the optical axis of the OP will form a focal line FoF. Figure 10 shows the course of the rays from the blades of grass, which are located at points 1—5. At the same time, to form this focal line, a part of the sphere P1 with a size of 3000x2200 mm (projection of the size of the stand with plants on the sphere) will work. Thus, there will be 250 thousand parallel rays from 250 thousand blades of grass per area of the sphere with a size of 3000x2200 mm. And ALL these rays will be reflected from the sphere and form a focal line FoF 16 cm long!
If it had been a parabola, that would have been the end of it. All these 250 thousand rays would be honestly focused at one point. Radiation from other directions will dissipate. But that’s NOT how the sphere works AT ALL!
Now consider Fig. 11. It is clear that from the center of the sphere to its surface, you can draw as many completely equivalent optical axes as you like. For example, the OR2 and OR3 axes. Then all 250 thousand plants from the stand will radiate together and parallel to these axes and will also form two focal lines on the optical axes OR2 and OR3 with a length of 16 cm. At the same time, a part of the sphere P2 will also work on the formation of the focal line on the OR2 axis with a size of 3000x2200 (projection on the sphere of the stand with plants in the direction of the OR2 axis). And for the formation of the focal line on the OR3 axis, a part of the P3 sphere with a size of 3000x2200 mm will work by analogy.
Also, from the center of the sphere O, you can draw many other axes (to the left, to the right, above, below). And, since 250 thousand plants will radiate parallel to these new axes, a focal line of 16 cm long will also be formed on all these new axes with the help of a part of a sphere measuring 3000x2200 mm! And these are thousands of optical axes within the angular aperture of the reflector in the form of a segment of a spherical surface. After all, an axis half a degree apart from the other will already form its own, completely independent focal line from the radiation of all 250 thousand plants from another