Практика международного трибунала по морскому праву. Д. Р. Абгарян
of the Tribunal (adopted 27 April 2005) // International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. Basic Texts. (Martinus Nijh off Leiden 2005). P. 15.
47
Resolution on the Internal Judicial Practice of the Tribunal’ (adopted 27 April 2005) // International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. Basic Texts (Martinus Nijh off Leiden 2005). P. 71.
48
Agreement on the Privileges and Immunities of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (adopted 23 May 1997) // International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ed) Basic Texts (Martinus Nijh off Leiden 2005). P. 82
49
Международная организация, созданная для реализации идеи «Общего наследия человечества» применительно к глубоководному дну Мирового океана.
50
The «Hoshinmaru» Case (Japan v. Russian Federation), Prompt Release. Judgment of 6 August 2007. ITLOS Reports. 2005–2007. P. 18.
51
Dispute concerning delimitation of the maritime boundary between Bangladesh and Myanmar in the Bay of Bengal (Bangladesh v. Myanmar). Judgment of 14 March 2012.
52
The «Chaisiri Reefer 2» Case (Panama v. Yemen) (Prompt Release). Order of July 13. 2001. 5 Int’l Trib. L. of the Sea Rep. of Judgments Advisory Opinions and Orders 82–84 (2001). Available at http://www.itlos.org/start2_en.html.
53
M/V «Saiga» (No. 2) Case, Order on Provisional Measures (St. Vincent v. Guinea), 37 I. L. M. 1202 (Int’l Trib. L. Sea, Mar. 11, 1998).
54
Trevers T. The Proceedings Concerning Prompt Release of Vessels and Crews // International Courts for the Twenty-First Century. L. 1996. Р. 179, 186.
55
Robin C. Hurchill. Trends in Dispute Settlement n the Law of the Sea: Towards the Increasing Availability of Compulsory Means // International Law and Dispute Settlement. New Problems and Techniques. Edited by Duncan French Matthew Saul and Nigel D. White. 2010. P. 153.
56
См.: Комиссия международного права. Проект статей о дипломатической защите // Ежегодник Комиссии международного права. 2006. С. 16.
57
Rosenne Sh. Provisional Measures in Interbational Law. OUP, 2005. P. 3.
58
Electricity Company of Sofia and Bulgaria (Interim Measures) case, PCIJ, Series a/b 79, 1939. P. 199.
59
Rosenne Sh. Op. cit. P. 46.
60
Saxena J. N. Limits of compulsory jurisdiction in respect of the law of the sea disputes // Law of the sea. Caracas and beyond / Ed. by R. P. Anand. The Hague; Boston; L., 1980.
61
Декларации государств о выборе суда или арбитража см: Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea, U. N. Office of Legal Affairs, Settlement of Disputes Mechanism: Choice of Procedure by States Parties Under Article 287 of the Convention. ‹http://www.un.org/Depts/los/lossdm1.htm›
62
Саксина Т. Г. Арбитражное урегулирование межгосударственных морских споров: Автореферат дисс… к. ю. н. М., 2007. С. 7.
63
Там же.
64
Хубиева М. Р. Практика международных судов и арбитражей, предусмотренных в Конвенции ООН по морскому праву 1982 г.: Дисс. к. ю. н. М., 2012. С. 28–29.
65
Хубиева М. Р. Указ. соч. С. 30.
66
Churchill R. Some Reflections on the Operation of the Dispute Settlement System of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea During its First Decade // The Law of the Sea. Progress and Prospects. Freestone D., Barnes R., Ong D. (eds). 2006. P. 294.
67
Хубиева М. Р. Указ. соч. С. 29.
68
Statement of Sri Lanka, 187th meeting. Official Records of the Third United nations Conference on the Law of the Sea. Vol. 17. P. 48. Para. 161.
69
Statement by the UN Secretary-General, 14th meeting, 20 June 1974, Official Records of the Third United nations Conference on the Law of the Sea. Vol. 1. P. 38. Para. 42.
70
Там же.
71
Предложение Перу о создании постоянной комиссии по морскому праву. UN Doc. A/Conf.62/L.22, Official Records of the Third United nations Conference on the Law of the Sea. Vol. 9. P. 180.
72
Предложение Португалии относительно учреждения периодической конференции по морским делам. Doc. A/Conf.62/L.23, Official Records of the Third United nations Conference on the Law of the Sea. Vol. 9. P. 181.
73
См.: Nordquist M. et al. eds. United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. A Commentary. V. 5. 1989. P. 252–253.
74
См., напр.: Freestone D., Oude Elferink A. Flexibility and Innovation in the Law of the Sea: Will the LOS Convention amendment procedures ever be used? // Oude Elferink A. (ed.) Stability and Change in the Law of the Sea: the Role of the LOS Convention, 2005. P. 173–183.
75
Freestone D., Barnes R., Ong D. (eds.). The Law of the Sea. Progress and Prospects. OUP, 2010. P. 14.
76
Stephen