Электронная коммерция в России и за рубежом: правовое регулирование. А. И. Савельев
v. Bliss, 733 A. 2d 954 (D.C. App. 1999); Asanov v. Hunt, 914 So. 2d 769 (Ct. App. Miss. 2005).
190
Yahoo! Inc. v. La Ligue Contre Le Racisme et L’Antisemitisme 145 F. Supp. 2d 1168 (N.D. Cal. 2001).
191
Securing the Protection of our Enduring and Established Constitutional Heritage (SPEECH) Act, 2010. Pub.L. 111–223.
192
New York Civil Practice Act § 302 (d). Press Release, New York State, Governor Patterson Signs Legislation Protecting New Yorkers Against Infringement of First Amendment Rights by Foreign Libel Judgments (May 1. 2008) // http://www.state.ny.us/governor/press/ press 0501082.html
193
InvestorsHub.com v. Mina Mar Group (N.D. Fla. 2011).
194
См. подробнее § 4 гл. 5 настоящей книги.
195
Comment «c» to § 431 Restatement 3d of Foreign Relations Law
196
См. подробнее: Савельев А.И. Односторонние экономические санкции США: взгляд со стороны американского и российского права // Закон. 2015, № 5.
197
Matthew H. Adler. If We Build It, Will They Come? The Need for a Multilateral Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Civil Monetary Judgments // Law and Policy in International Business. 1994. № 26. P. 96.
198
См. подробнее: Кашкин С.Ю., Четвериков А.О. Европейский Союз: основополагающие акты в редакции Лиссабонского договора с комментариями // СПС «КонсультантПлюс». 2007.
199
Council Regulation (EC). № 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters // Official Journal of the European Communities. L12/1. 16.1.2001.
200
Council Regulation (EC) № 1215/2012 of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters // Official Journal of the European Communities. L351/1. 20.12.2012.
201
Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (Recast) – Explanatory memorandum. Brussels. 14.12.2010. COM (2010) 748 Final.
202
Council Decision 2007/712/EC of 15 October 2007 // Official Journal of the European Communities. L 339. 21.12.2007.
203
См.: Section 6 Preamble to Council Regulation (EC). № 1215/2012 of 12 December 2012.
204
Regulation EC № 593/2008 of 17 June 2008 «On the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations» (Rome I) // Official Journal of the European Communities. L177/6. 04.07.2008.
205
Regulation EC № 864/2007 of 11 July 2007 «On the Law Applicable to Non-Contractual Obligations» (Rome II) // Official Journal of the European Communities. L 199. 31.07.2007.
206
Kramer X. The Rome II Regulation on the Law Applicable to Non-Contractual Obligations: The European Private International Law Tradition Continued – Introductory Observations, Scope, System, and General Rules (October 15, 2008). Nederlands Internationaal Privaatrecht (NIPR). No. 4. P. 414–424, 2008 // http://ssrn.com/abstract=1314749.
207
Goode R. Commercial Law. 3rd еd. London. 2004. P. 1079.
208
EC Commission, E-Commerce and Indirect Taxation (COM(98). 374. 17.06.1998). P. 5. Guideline 2; Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Electronic Commerce: A Discussion Paper on Taxation Issues, 17.09.1998, available at http://www.oecd. org//daf/fa/e_com/discusse.pdf
209
Falco Privatstiftung and Thomas Rabitsch v. Gisela Weller-Lindhorst [2009] ECR, C-533/07.
210
Directive 2011/83/EU of October 2011 on Сonsumer Rights Mending Council Directive 93/13/EEC and Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Repealing Council Directive 85/577/EEC and Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council // Official Journal of European Union. 22.11.2011. L 304/64.
211
Gie Groupe Concorde and Others [1999] ECR. C-440/97.
212
Faye Fangei Wang. Obstacles and Solutions to Internet Jurisdiction: A Comparative Analysis of the EU and US Laws // Journal of International Commercial Law and Technology. № 3. 2008.
213
По крайней мере, такая неопределенность существует. См.: Owusu v Jackson, ECJ, Case C-281/02, 2005.
214
Gasser GmbH v MISAT srl (Case C-116/02) [2003] ECR I-14693.
215
Savin A. Op. cit. P. 61.
216
В соответствии с устоявшейся практикой Европейского суда в качестве потребителя может выступать только физическое лицо. Bertrand v. Ott [1978] ECR С-150/7.
217
Savin A. Op. cit. P. 62.
218
Foss M., Bygrave L. International Consumer Purchases through the Internet: Jurisdictional Issues pursuant to European Law // International Journal of Law and Information Technology. № 8. 2000. P. 14.
219
European Commission, Justice and Home Affairs DG, «Statement on Articles 15 and 73» // http://www.europa.eu.int/comm-/justice home/unit/civil/justciv-conseil/justiciv-en. pdf. Данный подход был подтвержден Европейским судом в деле Hotel Alpenhof GesmbH v. Oliver Heller (C-144/09), 7 December