The Renaissance Diet 2.0. Mike Israetel
blood glucose and glycogen provide energy more quickly and easily than breaking down your body’s tissues. Your fat stores can provide energy for movement as well, but the rate of energy release in this case is much slower and cannot keep up with the energy demands of most sports. To put this in perspective, the breakdown of fat tissue for energy release does not even reach its peak rates until around two hours into an exercise session. Even its peak rates are not as efficient at providing fuel for sport performance as blood glucose and glycogen, making it a much less desirable option. In other words, reducing calories and relying predominantly on fat sources for energy almost always leads to poorer performance.
In addition to providing energy for activity, calories also provide the energy for recovery from training. The process of training for sport is, at least in part, tearing down and rebuilding stronger tissues. Gaining muscle and training for strength both involve induced tissue damage that, under the right conditions, leads to recovery and adaptation to a bigger, stronger state.
Even in cases where an athlete’s current sport progress needs are entirely technical, fatigue and tissue damage will arise just from extensive practice and repetition. Many sports also involve contact, such as American football, rugby, and combat sports, which also results in tissue damage or minor injuries. All this damage must be repaired, and this process requires energy. In addition to providing energy for structural repairs, calorie intake can influence how much glycogen stores are refilled. In a hypocaloric state, most available energy is dedicated to basic bodily function. The body will allocate some energy to support repair and recovery processes, but these resources are limited; the process will be slower, and recovery will be incomplete. (If you are severely hypocaloric, you may not be able to rebuild tissue at all.) In a hypercaloric state, repair and recovery will be optimal thanks to a surplus of energy. (For more information about recovery, see Recovering from Training, available on our website renaissanceperiodization.com as an ebook or audible file.)
Body size is directly affected by calorie intake and influences performance. Calories, therefore, also indirectly affect performance via their influence on body size. Depending on your sport, your body needs to be within some margin of sizes for best performance. For example, if you are the best gymnast at 130 lb. but you only eat enough calories to support a body weight of 90 lb., your diet will be unable to support your best gymnastic performance. You will not have the energy or raw materials to build muscles big enough to perform at your best. If you are a runner, and you eat enough calories to weigh 210 lb. but your best power-to-weight ratio is at 160 lb., you are dragging around an extra 50 lb., inevitably slowing your running times.
CALORIES AND BODY COMPOSITION
Body composition describes how much muscle and fat makes up your body. Improving body composition usually refers to getting leaner, more muscular, or both. Conversely, poor body composition tends to mean low muscle mass, an unfavorable excess of fat, or both. As you might expect, the vast majority of diets attempt to improve body composition. Calorie balance is the single biggest tool for altering body composition.
Your body is primed by millions of years of evolution to prepare itself for impending famine, something that has been a feature of the human (and animal) experience for as far back as biologists can investigate. Millions of years of natural selection have left your body designed to store as much energy as possible to prepare for times of low food availability. When your body is exposed to the hypercaloric condition, it stores most of the excess energy as body fat. This is logical because in ancestral environments, times of plenty were inevitably followed by times of scarcity, and storing excess calories as fat in the former literally saved your life in the latter. If an athlete or dieter is on a hypercaloric diet today, the chances that their body will activate fat-burning pathways over fat-building pathways are quite low. When extra calories are around, fat gain is usually a result.
Muscle growth rates are much smaller than fat gain rates. This is again a side effect of our evolution. Muscle mass is metabolically costly; it requires more energy to build and maintain than fat mass. Thus, the body sees adding extra muscle as a survival disadvantage under most circumstances. Only when there is a pressing need (increasingly difficult weight-bearing tasks) and a steady hypercaloric condition will any significant muscle mass be gained and even then to a lesser extent than fat. It is not uncommon for people to lose 15 lb. of fat in three months in a hypocaloric condition, but gaining 15 lb. of muscle in the same timeframe under hypercaloric conditions is virtually impossible. In fact, 15 lb. would be an impressive amount of muscle to build even in your first year of training.
For muscle to grow, there are two fundamental requirements: 1) the energy and raw material (amino acids from protein–the building blocks for muscle) with which to fuel the building of the muscle. Just like a frugal family will not get a new deck added to their home unless there is more money coming in than is needed for food and to pay bills, the body will not activate muscle growth pathways to any large extent until excess calories and plenty of protein are coming in. And 2) the stimulation of muscle growth from proper overload training. For the body to be convinced that metabolically costly muscle mass is worth adding, the consistent need for that muscle mass must be presented in the form of increasingly difficult resistance training.
It might seem obvious that results from concurrent body recomposition–simultaneous fat loss and muscle gain–pale in comparison to losing fat and gaining muscle in separate phases. This is because the most powerful methods for fat loss and muscle gain are diametrically opposed. For fat loss to occur at best rates, a hypocaloric condition is needed. When a hypocaloric condition is detected by body systems, it primes and prepares fat burning precisely to make up the impending deficit. In contrast, for best muscle gain rates, a hypercaloric condition and weight gain are needed. When a surplus of energy is coming in, the body is less resistant to packing on some metabolically costly muscle along with fat for energy storage. An isocaloric diet is the midpoint of the two-principle calorie balance paradigms and is not a powerful stimulator of fat loss nor muscle growth. Because our best tools for each are literal opposites, combining them gives us neither of each. Simply, if your goal is muscle gain, generate a hypercaloric condition. If your goal is fat loss, generate a hypocaloric condition.
There are specific, albeit rare and limited, instances when recomposition does occur. As we discuss these cases, keep in mind impressive social media transformation stories you might have seen in the past, and how one or more of these circumstances may have been at play. Also consider that having recomposition as a goal in your own diet design is likely a fool’s errand in most cases, or at the very least not an efficient game plan.
Case 1: New to Dieting
If an individual has been eating poorly for years and dives headfirst into controlling their calories, macros, timing, and food composition, the combined power of all of those novel effects can be quite large–in some cases large enough to build a bit of muscle while simultaneously burning fat under isocaloric conditions. In a hypercaloric condition, individuals new to serious dieting can even gain weight while losing fat. Individuals in hypocaloric conditions can gain muscle and get much stronger while undergoing rapid fat loss. Because these impressive transformations are built on the element of novelty to formal dieting, this ability diminishes after several months as the body adjusts to a state where composition changes occur slowly.
Case 2: New to Training
In the first several months of training, especially if resistance and cardiovascular styles are programmed in high volumes, the demand for muscle growth nutrients and energy can be so high that fat stores are burned in large quantities to meet the need. Those new to the training process can see results very similar to those new to dieting in terms of radical simultaneous muscle gains and fat losses. If someone starts both training and dieting formally for the first time, concurrent recomposition can be achieved for the first several months, seemingly in contradiction with our understanding of physiology. Such abilities will decrease within several months of training. For continued progress, separate hypocaloric and hypercaloric phases will be needed for efficient fat loss