Software As A Secure Service A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk
How do you gather Software as a secure service requirements?
<--- Score
5. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
6. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
7. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
8. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
9. What gets examined?
<--- Score
10. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
11. What are the Software as a secure service tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
12. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
13. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Software as a secure service?
<--- Score
14. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
15. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
16. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
17. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
18. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
19. Has the Software as a secure service work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
20. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
21. Is there a critical path to deliver Software as a secure service results?
<--- Score
22. Who approved the Software as a secure service scope?
<--- Score
23. How do you manage changes in Software as a secure service requirements?
<--- Score
24. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Software as a secure service? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
25. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
26. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
27. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Software as a secure service brings?
<--- Score
28. How will the Software as a secure service team and the group measure complete success of Software as a secure service?
<--- Score
29. Is the team sponsored by a champion or stakeholder leader?
<--- Score
30. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
31. How do you catch Software as a secure service definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
32. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?
<--- Score
33. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
34. Will team members regularly document their Software as a secure service work?
<--- Score
35. Will team members perform Software as a secure service work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
36. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
37. What sources do you use to gather information for a Software as a secure service study?
<--- Score
38. Are accountability and ownership for Software as a secure service clearly defined?
<--- Score
39. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
40. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
41. Is the Software as a secure service scope manageable?
<--- Score
42. Is there a Software as a secure service management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
43. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
44. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
45. What happens if Software as a secure service’s scope changes?
<--- Score
46. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
47. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
48. Has a Software as a secure service requirement not been met?
<--- Score
49. Are the Software as a secure service requirements testable?
<--- Score
50. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
51. Is Software as a secure service required?
<--- Score
52. Are stakeholder processes mapped?
<--- Score
53. Is the Software as a secure service scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
54. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
55. Who are the Software as a secure service improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
56. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Software as a secure service leverage and how?
<--- Score
57. Are the Software as a secure service requirements complete?
<--- Score
58. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?