System Protection A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk
Score
68. How do you manage changes in System Protection requirements?
<--- Score
69. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
70. Is there a clear System Protection case definition?
<--- Score
71. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
72. Will team members perform System Protection work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
73. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
74. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
75. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
76. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform System Protection work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
77. What was the context?
<--- Score
78. What is the scope of System Protection?
<--- Score
79. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
80. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
81. How will the System Protection team and the group measure complete success of System Protection?
<--- Score
82. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
83. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
84. What system do you use for gathering System Protection information?
<--- Score
85. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
86. How do you gather System Protection requirements?
<--- Score
87. Is there a critical path to deliver System Protection results?
<--- Score
88. What happens if System Protection’s scope changes?
<--- Score
89. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
90. How does the System Protection manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
91. What System Protection services do you require?
<--- Score
92. What are the System Protection use cases?
<--- Score
93. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
94. How can the value of System Protection be defined?
<--- Score
95. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
96. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the System Protection goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
97. Will a System Protection production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
98. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
99. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
100. How do you catch System Protection definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
101. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected System Protection results are met?
<--- Score
102. Are improvement team members fully trained on System Protection?
<--- Score
103. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
104. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
105. Is System Protection currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
106. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
107. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
108. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
109. Who is gathering System Protection information?
<--- Score
110. Is there a System Protection management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
111. How do you manage unclear System Protection requirements?
<--- Score
112. How are consistent System Protection definitions important?
<--- Score
113. Are the System Protection requirements testable?
<--- Score
114. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
115. What are (control) requirements for System Protection Information?
<--- Score
116. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
117. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
118. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
119. Are the System Protection requirements complete?
<--- Score
120. What gets examined?
<--- Score
121. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
122. What would be the goal or target for a System Protection’s improvement team?
<--- Score
123. Has the System Protection work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work?