Social Cognition A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk
date?
<--- Score
17. How are consistent Social cognition definitions important?
<--- Score
18. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
19. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
20. What would be the goal or target for a Social cognition’s improvement team?
<--- Score
21. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
22. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
23. Are accountability and ownership for Social cognition clearly defined?
<--- Score
24. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
25. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
26. Is the scope of Social cognition defined?
<--- Score
27. What are the core elements of the Social cognition business case?
<--- Score
28. Will a Social cognition production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
29. What are the Social cognition use cases?
<--- Score
30. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
31. What is the context?
<--- Score
32. What is the scope of the Social cognition effort?
<--- Score
33. Is Social cognition linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
34. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
35. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Social cognition results are met?
<--- Score
36. What are the Social cognition tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
37. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
38. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
39. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
40. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
41. How do you gather Social cognition requirements?
<--- Score
42. Is the Social cognition scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
43. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
44. Have all basic functions of Social cognition been defined?
<--- Score
45. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
46. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
47. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
48. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
49. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
50. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
51. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
52. How have you defined all Social cognition requirements first?
<--- Score
53. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
54. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
55. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
56. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
57. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Social cognition leverage and how?
<--- Score
58. What sources do you use to gather information for a Social cognition study?
<--- Score
59. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
60. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
61. What is the scope of Social cognition?
<--- Score
62. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
63. Is the Social cognition scope manageable?
<--- Score
64. How do you think the partners involved in Social cognition would have defined success?
<--- Score
65. How does the Social cognition manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
66. What happens if Social cognition’s scope changes?
<--- Score
67. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
68. How would you define Social cognition leadership?
<--- Score
69. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
70. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
71. Is Social cognition currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
72. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
73. Who are the Social cognition improvement