Materials Processing A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk
<--- Score
13. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
14. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
15. Has a Materials Processing requirement not been met?
<--- Score
16. What would be the goal or target for a Materials Processing’s improvement team?
<--- Score
17. Is Materials Processing required?
<--- Score
18. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Materials Processing?
<--- Score
19. Are accountability and ownership for Materials Processing clearly defined?
<--- Score
20. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
21. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
22. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
23. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
24. What are the record-keeping requirements of Materials Processing activities?
<--- Score
25. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
26. Are the Materials Processing requirements complete?
<--- Score
27. How do you hand over Materials Processing context?
<--- Score
28. Is there a critical path to deliver Materials Processing results?
<--- Score
29. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
30. How did the Materials Processing manager receive input to the development of a Materials Processing improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
31. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
32. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
33. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
34. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Materials Processing leverage and how?
<--- Score
35. Will a Materials Processing production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
36. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
37. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
38. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
39. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
40. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
41. How would you define Materials Processing leadership?
<--- Score
42. Do you all define Materials Processing in the same way?
<--- Score
43. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
44. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
45. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Materials Processing work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
46. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
47. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
48. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
49. What happens if Materials Processing’s scope changes?
<--- Score
50. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
51. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
52. Is Materials Processing currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
53. Who approved the Materials Processing scope?
<--- Score
54. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
55. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
56. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Materials Processing? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
57. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
58. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
59. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
60. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
61. How do you think the partners involved in Materials Processing would have defined success?
<--- Score
62. How do you manage changes in Materials Processing requirements?
<--- Score
63. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
64. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
65. How do you manage unclear Materials Processing requirements?
<--- Score
66. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
67. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
68. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
69. How do you gather Materials Processing requirements?
<--- Score
70. How will variation in the actual durations of each