Materials Processing A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk
they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
127. What is the definition of Materials Processing excellence?
<--- Score
128. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
129. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Materials Processing Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. How do you measure success?
<--- Score
2. What drives O&M cost?
<--- Score
3. How can a Materials Processing test verify your ideas or assumptions?
<--- Score
4. How are you verifying it?
<--- Score
5. What are the Materials Processing investment costs?
<--- Score
6. Are Materials Processing vulnerabilities categorized and prioritized?
<--- Score
7. Who pays the cost?
<--- Score
8. What evidence is there and what is measured?
<--- Score
9. What are your key Materials Processing organizational performance measures, including key short and longer-term financial measures?
<--- Score
10. What is the cost of rework?
<--- Score
11. What tests verify requirements?
<--- Score
12. How will effects be measured?
<--- Score
13. How is the value delivered by Materials Processing being measured?
<--- Score
14. How do you verify if Materials Processing is built right?
<--- Score
15. How do you verify your resources?
<--- Score
16. Where is it measured?
<--- Score
17. What are the Materials Processing key cost drivers?
<--- Score
18. What details are required of the Materials Processing cost structure?
<--- Score
19. How do you verify and develop ideas and innovations?
<--- Score
20. Are supply costs steady or fluctuating?
<--- Score
21. Do you have any cost Materials Processing limitation requirements?
<--- Score
22. What are the costs?
<--- Score
23. How will success or failure be measured?
<--- Score
24. What do you measure and why?
<--- Score
25. What causes mismanagement?
<--- Score
26. Have you included everything in your Materials Processing cost models?
<--- Score
27. What does a Test Case verify?
<--- Score
28. What are the operational costs after Materials Processing deployment?
<--- Score
29. Does management have the right priorities among projects?
<--- Score
30. What harm might be caused?
<--- Score
31. What relevant entities could be measured?
<--- Score
32. How can you measure Materials Processing in a systematic way?
<--- Score
33. What do people want to verify?
<--- Score
34. How sensitive must the Materials Processing strategy be to cost?
<--- Score
35. What causes extra work or rework?
<--- Score
36. Are there measurements based on task performance?
<--- Score
37. Which costs should be taken into account?
<--- Score
38. What does verifying compliance entail?
<--- Score
39. What are your primary costs, revenues, assets?
<--- Score
40. Is the solution cost-effective?
<--- Score
41. What are you verifying?
<--- Score
42. What are the current costs of the Materials Processing process?
<--- Score
43. What users will be impacted?
<--- Score
44. What is the total cost related to deploying Materials Processing, including any consulting or professional services?
<--- Score
45. When a disaster occurs, who gets priority?
<--- Score
46. What are the estimated costs of proposed changes?
<--- Score
47. How can you measure the performance?
<--- Score
48. Are you able to realize any cost savings?
<--- Score
49. What potential environmental factors impact the Materials Processing effort?
<--- Score
50. What is your decision requirements diagram?
<--- Score
51. Is it possible to estimate the impact of unanticipated complexity such as wrong or failed assumptions, feedback, etcetera on proposed reforms?
<---