Human Capital Risk A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk
is this documented?
<--- Score
75. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
76. Is Human Capital Risk currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
77. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
78. How does the Human Capital Risk manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
79. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
80. What is the definition of Human Capital Risk excellence?
<--- Score
81. Is the Human Capital Risk scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
82. What sources do you use to gather information for a Human Capital Risk study?
<--- Score
83. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
84. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Human Capital Risk results are met?
<--- Score
85. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
86. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
87. Is the scope of Human Capital Risk defined?
<--- Score
88. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
89. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
90. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
91. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?
<--- Score
92. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
93. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Human Capital Risk?
<--- Score
94. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
95. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
96. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
97. When is/was the Human Capital Risk start date?
<--- Score
98. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
99. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
100. Is the Human Capital Risk scope manageable?
<--- Score
101. What was the context?
<--- Score
102. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
103. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
104. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
105. What are (control) requirements for Human Capital Risk Information?
<--- Score
106. Who is gathering Human Capital Risk information?
<--- Score
107. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Human Capital Risk leverage and how?
<--- Score
108. Is there a Human Capital Risk management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
109. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
110. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Human Capital Risk work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
111. What is the scope of the Human Capital Risk effort?
<--- Score
112. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
113. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
114. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
115. Who are the Human Capital Risk improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
116. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
117. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Human Capital Risk goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
118. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
119. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
120. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
121. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
122. Are accountability and ownership for Human Capital Risk clearly defined?
<--- Score
123. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
124. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
125. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
126. What are the Human Capital Risk tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
127. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant,