Critical Digital Making in Art Education. Группа авторов
D. R. Wilkins (Ed.). Retrieved https://www.maths.tcd.ie/~dwilkins/Berkeley/Vision/1709A/Vision.pdf
Bert, G. (2016). La Bestia /The Beast [woven cotton tapestry with an embedded QR code]. Collection of the Artist, Los Angeles, CA.
Bratich, J. (2010). The digital touch: Craft-work as immaterial labor and ontological accumulation. Ephemera, 10(3/4), 303–318. Retrieved from http://www.ephemerajournal.org/issue-archive
Chisholm, R. (1957). Perceiving: A philosophical study. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Elo, M. (2012). Digital finger: Beyond phenomenological figures of touch. Journal of Aesthetics & Culture, 4(1), 14982. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3402/jac.v4i0.14982
Fisher, J. (1997). Relational sense: Towards a haptic aesthetics. Parachute: Contemporary Art Magazine, 87, 4–11. Retrieved from http://www.david-howes.com/senses/Fisher.htm
Gerhardt, T. (2009). Mud Tub [tangible interface]. TomGerhardt.com. Retrieved from http://tomgerhardt.com/mudtub.
Greenhalgh, P. (2002). The persistence of craft. New Jersey, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Greer, B. (2011). Craftivist history. In M. E. Buszek (Ed.), Extra/ordinary: Craft and contemporary Art (pp. 175–183). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Guthrie, G. (2013, April 7). Where are the women?. Retrieved from https://makezine.com/2013/04/07/where-are-the-women
Heller, L., & Millerson, D. (2017). All hands on tech: Craft, pedagogy and the digital challenge [Powerpoint slides]. Lecture presented at the Canadian Craft Biennial, Burlington, ON.
Howes, P., & Laughlin, Z. (2012). Material matters: New materials in design. London, UK: Black Dog Publishing.
Infinite Dreams. (2017). Let’s create! Pottery lite (Version 1.63) [Computer application software]. Retrieved from https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=pl.idreams.potterylite&hl=en
Kant, I. (1781/1998). The critique of pure reason. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Kortum, P. (2008). HCI beyond the GUI: Design for haptic, speech, olfactory, and other nontraditional interfaces. Burlington, UK: Elsevier.
Langlands, A. (2018). Craeft:An inquiry into the origins and true meaning of traditional crafts (First American ed.). New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Lovelace, A. K., & Toole, B. A. (1998). Ada, the enchantress of numbers: A selection from the letters of Lord Byron’s daughter and her description of the first computer (2nd ed.). Mill Valley, CA: Strawberry Press.
Marquardt, N., Jota, R., Greenberg, S., & Jorge, J. A. (2011). The continuous interaction space: Interaction techniques unifying touch and gesture on and above a digital surface. In P. Campos, N. Graham, J. Jorge, N. Nunes, P. Palanque, & M. Winckler (Eds.), Human-Computer Interaction—INTERACT 2011 (pp. 461–476). Berlin: Springer.
←33 | 34→
Mattes, K. (2018). Response to the access Hollywood tapes [handwoven cotton and wool, pine]. Property of the artist. Los Angeles, CA. Response to Donald Trump Jr.’s Comments About Syrian Refugees [handwoven cotton and wool, pine]. Property of the artist. Los Angeles, CA.
Mazanti, L. (2011). Super-objects: Craft as an aesthetic position. In Buszek, M. E. (Ed.), Extra/ordinary: Craft and contemporary art (pp. 59–82). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Mazza, C. (n.d.). Nike blanket petition [Crochet and knit; natural and synthetic yarns; web media]. Retrieved from http://www.microrevolt.org/web/blanket.htm
Milgram, P., & Kishino, F. (1994). A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, E77-D, 1321–1329.
Monteiro, S. (2017). The Fabric of interface: Mobile media, design, and gender. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
O’Shaughnessy, B. (1989). The sense of touch. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 67(1), 37–58. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/00048408912343671
Paterson, E. C., & Surette, S. (2015). Sloppy craft: Postdisciplinarity and the crafts. London, UK: Bloomsbury.
Patton, R. M., & Knochel, A. D. (2017). Meaningful makers: Stuff, sharing, and connection in STEAM curriculum. Art Education, 70(1), 36–43. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2017.1247571
Pussyhat Project. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.pussyhatproject.com/faq/
Smith, A., Bryan-Wilson, J., Collins, L., Gschwandter, S., & Mazza, C., (2010). The Politics of craft: A roundtable. In G. Adamson (Ed.), The craft reader (pp.620–628). Oxford, UK: Berg Publishers.
Sparrman, B., Darbari, S., Rustom, R., Huges, M., Kerizan, S., Laucks, J., …, Stegmar, A. (2019). Liquid printed pneumatics. Retrieved from https://selfassemblylab.mit.edu/liquid-printed-pneumatics
Tessmer, L., Snow, C., Richter, S., Kernizan, S., Laucks, J., Tibbits, S., … Harrard, J. (2019). Active textile tailoring. Retrieved from https://selfassemblylab.mit.edu/active-textile-tailoring
Vasseleu, C. (1999). Touch, digital communication and the ticklish. Angelaki, 4(2), 153–162. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/09697259908572044
Wensveen, S., Djajadiningrat, J. P., & Overbeeke, C. J. (2004). Interaction frogger: A design framework to couple action and function through feedback and feedforward. DIS2004—Designing Interactive Systems: Across the Spectrum, 177–184, 177–184. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1145/1013115.1013140
3D Systems. (2019). Retrieved from https://www.3dsystems.com/haptics-devices/geomagic-touch-x
←34 | 35→
CHAPTER TWO
Experimental Material-Digital Art Education by Vague Research Studios
LENA T.H. BERGLIN AND KAJSA G. ERIKSSON
In an increasingly digital society, there is not only a shift from analog to digital, but also a shift to a culture performed through embedded technology. Digital technology alters an object and makes it intelligent and these objects have more to do with information exchange than with form, material, body, and the environment (Manzini, 1986). Instead of taking these challenges into consideration, the expressive and interactive qualities of digital technology