Western Civilization. Paul R. Waibel

      Figure 3.1 Map of the Roman Empire, AD 117.

The Second Punic War (218–202 BC) broke out when Carthage attacked the city of Saguntum, a Roman ally in Spain. The Carthaginian general, Hannibal (247–183 BC), invaded Italy by taking a largely mercenary army across the Alps into the Po valley. Though he won a number of impressive victories against the Romans in Italy, he was never strong enough to attack Rome itself. The Romans took the war to North Africa in 204 BC with an army under the command of Publius Cornelius Scipio (236–183 BC), later know as Scipio Africanus. Hannibal returned home to defend Carthage, only to suffer defeat by Scipio at the battle of Zama in 202 BC. Carthage was defeated and forced to surrender Spain, pay a huge indemnity, and disarm.

The Third Punic War (149–146 BC) was more a massacre than a war. Roman hatred of Carthage was fueled by Carthage's growing commercial prosperity. In 150 BC, the Romans seized upon a minor incident to demand that the Carthaginians abandon Carthage and move 10 miles inland. When they refused, the Romans declared war and laid siege to the city. Carthage finally fell in 146 BC after a three‐year siege. The Romans sacked and burned the city. Those citizens who survived were sold into slavery. Scipio ordered the city totally destroyed, leaving not one stone on top of another, and decreed that no city should ever exist, or crop ever grow again on the site of Carthage.² Rome was now the foremost military power in the western Mediterranean. Soon its attention turned to the Hellenistic east.

Roman Expansion in the East

      Roman victory in the Punic Wars did not make Rome an empire. Some historians suggest that the Roman Republic reluctantly became an empire. There was no plan of conquest. The Romans tried to avoid involvement beyond the Italian peninsula. But Rome soon discovered that peace in the Mediterranean world was vital for Rome's survival and future prosperity. That realization compelled Rome to intervene again and again in disputes between various powers at the eastern end of the Mediterranean Sea. During the last two centuries BC, the Roman Republic became an empire ruling over the whole of the Mediterranean world.

      Rome was drawn into the wars between the three successor kingdoms of Alexander the Great's empire – the Kingdom of Macedon, the Seleucid Empire, and the Ptolemaic Kingdom of Egypt. As Rome expanded, it became increasingly dependent upon Egypt for grain. Instability in the East threatened Rome's prosperity. In a series of so‐called Macedonian Wars, fought between 214 and 148 BC, Rome became master of Greece.

When the Corinthian‐led Achaean League revolted in146 BC, Rome crushed the revolt and brought Greece under Roman rule. Though Athens, Sparta, and Delphi remained nominally independent as Roman allies, Corinth was utterly destroyed,³ and the remainder of Greece was placed under the authority of the Roman governor of Macedon. Attalus III (c. 170–133 BC), the last king of Pergamum, willed his kingdom to Rome in 133 BC. It became the Roman province of Asia in 129 BC. Only Egypt and the Seleucid kingdom remained independent, albeit at the mercy of Rome.

      Rome, the small city‐state on the banks of the Tiber River in Italy, was now the master of a vast empire that dominated the Mediterranean world. The impact of such success brought a whole host of economic and social changes that fundamentally altered the character of Roman civilization and called into question the ability of republican institutions to govern such a vast empire.

Decline of the Republic

      The growth of a vast overseas empire brought both prosperity and increasing stress on the old republican institutions. Three issues in particular became critical during the last century of the Roman Republic. The first problem was how a city‐state could successfully govern such a vast empire. A city‐state was geographically small with a small population and culturally homogeneous. Republican institutions that might work in a very small world were not suited to empires, especially lacking modern communication. A second issue was the question of how Rome could adjust to the economic and social changes caused by the influx of great wealth and the growth of a slave‐based economy. Finally, Rome faced the problem of finding a focus of unity for the empire, as the empire grew and became increasingly more pluralistic and multicultural. Efforts to solve these issues eventually destroyed the Republic.

      The growth of empire meant a steady stream of wealth and cheap labor in the form of slaves. Together, they transformed the social and economic life of the Republic. The senatorial class and the equestrians (equites) benefitted from the expansion. The equestrians were large landowners, bankers, merchants, and public contractors (e.g. tax farmers) who supplied the needs of the new empire. The lower classes, especially the small farmers, did not benefit. They suffered.

      The appearance of large estates, or plantations called latifundia, and the passing of the small independent farmers was a particularly destructive trend. Wealthy landowners acquired public lands, which they turned into large plantations producing cash crops for a commercial market, for example cattle and sheep in southern Italy, or olives and wine in central Italy. These plantations were worked by large gangs of slaves, who were often sold as disposable slaves in the mines when they became old or feeble. It is estimated that approximately one‐third of the population of Italy in the first century BC was slaves.

      The small farmers could not compete with the large estates worked by slave labor. They were often forced, by circumstances, to sell out to the large landowners. They then drifted into Rome, where, together with returning veterans, they formed a troublesome and potentially powerful voting bloc. Two brothers, Tiberius and Gaius Gracchus, recognized this potential.

      The Gracchi brothers were grandsons of Scipio Africanus, the hero of the Second Punic War. They were reformers in the tradition of the two Greeks, Solon and Cleisthenes. They believed it was necessary to restore the class of independent farmers in order to restore the old Roman virtues. Though of the nobility, they used the office of tribune to become champions of the lower classes.

Tiberius Gracchus (c. 163–133 BC) was elected tribune in 134 BC. His goal was to restore the class of small farmers through a program of land reform. He proposed that public lands acquired illegally by the large landowners should be returned to the state. The state would then give them out in small allotments to the poor. The program would be paid for out of the treasury of Pergamum, willed to Rome in 133 BC by Attalus III.

      In pursuit of his goal, Tiberius violated custom by ignoring the Senate and attempting to implement his land reform program through the Plebeian Assembly. Also, his plan to use funds from the treasury of Pergamum violated the tradition of the Senate's control of foreign affairs. Tiberius committed a further offense by standing for reelection as tribune. Tribunes were elected for only one year. Such disregard for accepted traditions alienated the senatorial class. Resorting to violence rather than reason and compromise, a mob, urged on by members of the Senate. killed Tiberius and 300 of his supporters in the summer of 133 BC.

      Tiberius' younger brother Gaius (153–121 BC) was elected tribune in 124 BC. He was a more astute politician than his brother. In addition to continuing the land reform policies of Tiberius, Gaius sought other means of helping the lower classes. He founded new colonies on public lands in Italy. Perhaps, most significant, was his plan to stabilize the price of grain in Rome, a matter of critical importance for the poor. The government began buying grain in bulk and then reselling it at fixed prices to the poor. Once begun, no Roman leader to the end