Fundamentals of Fixed Prosthodontics. James C. Kessler

---

Скачать книгу

---

All^† Yes^† Metal inlay Moderate 2 No Yes Poor to adequate* Minimal No^§ No Class II Poor Class V No Ceramic inlay Moderate 3 No No Good Minimal No^§ No Class II Adequate Class V No MOD onlay Moderate to large 1 No Yes Poor to adequate* Moderate Yes Yes Good No No Yes Extracoronal Partial coverage crown Large 1 Yes Yes Poor to adequate Moderate Yes Yes Good Poor Rev ¾; Prox ½† Yes All-metal crown Large 1 Yes Yes Poor Good Yes Yes Good Poor All^† Yes Metal-ceramic crown Large 2 Yes Yes Good Good Yes Yes Good Good All Yes All-ceramic crown Large 3 No No Good Good Yes Yes^|| Adequate Good All Yes Ceramic veneer Incipient 3 No No Good Adequate No No^¶ Poor Good All No

      FPD, fixed partial denture; RPD, removable partial denture; NA, not applicable; rev, reverse; prox, proximal.

      *Dependent on tooth position, location of restoration (mesial or distal), and patient expectation.

      ^†Structurally sound, but not esthetic.

      ^†An acceptable compromise treatment if cusps are capped with amalgam.

      ^§May offer some protection in conjunction with etching and bonding.

      ^||When used with a core or foundation restoration.

      ^¶Can be used to replace an incisal corner.

       Table 6-2 Longevity of single-tooth restorations

Investigator(s)	Type of study	No. of restorations	Restoration type
Glass ionomer	Composite resin	Simple amalgam	Complex amalgam	Metal inlay	Ceramic inlay	MOD onlay	Partial coverage crown	All-metal crown	Metal-ceramic crown	All-ceramic crown	Ceramic veneer
Bentley and Drake14	Clinical	1,207	—	55.9% at 10 y	72.0% at 10 y	—	87.3% at 10 y	—	87.3% at 10 y	—	86.3% at 10 y	—	—	—
Maryniuk15	Clinical*	1,940	—	—	10 to 14 y	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Meeuwissen et al16	Clinical	8,492	—	—	58.0% at 10 y	—	—	—		—	—	—	—	—
Arthur et al17	Clinical	2,200	—	—	83% at 10 y	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Qvist et al18,23	Clinical	442	—	50% at 6.1 y Скачать книгу