Handbook of Enology: Volume 1. Pascal Ribéreau-Gayon

Handbook of Enology: Volume 1 - Pascal Ribéreau-Gayon


Скачать книгу
1.40).

Schematic illustration of breakdown of karyotypes of 10 strains analyzed in tanks I, II, and III from vineyard (F) in 1990, with massive early inoculation with F5, F10, and 522M, respectively (Frezier, 1992). b, c, and d: see Figure 1.39.

      Vezhinet et al. (1992) and Versavaud et al. (1995) have also studied the clonal diversity of yeast microflora in other wine regions. Their results confirm the polyclonal character of fermentative populations of S. cerevisiae. The notion of dominant strains (one to two per fermentation) is obvious in the work carried out in the Charentes region. As in Champagne and the Loire Valley, some Charentes strains are found for several years in a row in the same winery. The presence of these dominant strains on the grape has been confirmed before any contact with winery equipment during several harvests.

      Why do some S. cerevisiae strains coming from a very heterogeneous population become dominant during spontaneous fermentation? Why can they be found two to three years in a row in the same vineyard and wine cellar? Despite their practical interest, these questions have not often been studied, and there are no definitive responses. It seems that these strains rapidly start and complete alcoholic fermentation and have good resistance to sulfur dioxide (up to 10 g/hl). Furthermore, during mixed inoculations in the laboratory of either non‐fermented musts or partially fermented musts (8% ethanol by vol.), these strains rapidly become dominant when placed in the presence of other wild nondominant strains of S. cerevisiae isolated at the start and end of fermentation. This subject merits further research.

      Studies conducted in the Bordeaux region were recently revisited by using the analysis of microsatellite markers, in order to integrate genetic approaches to populations in the genetic diversity results for the strains (Börlin, 2015). Results confirm the very large genetic diversity of S. cerevisiae strains in the vineyard and in spontaneous fermentation in the Bordeaux region. Of 1,374 isolates from grapes and 1,078 isolates from fermenting must, 75% have different genotypes. During spontaneous fermentation, the presence of yeasts related to commercial yeasts, i.e. that share at least 75% of genetic markers, is low (7%). This result, which mainly concerns organic wine cellars, merits confirmation in conventional cellars. However, a higher percentage (25%) of strains related to industrial yeast is obtained for the population of S. cerevisiae isolated from grapes in the vineyard. Therefore, this result highlights the importance, underestimated until now, of cellar yeasts being returned to the vineyard environment. Prior work showed that the detection of strains in the vineyard was possible in a radius of 10–200 m around the cellar where they were used (Valero et al., 2007; Schuller et al., 2007). Our data show a dissemination of winery yeasts in the vineyard over a maximum distance of 400 m from the cellar.

      In Bordeaux vineyards, structural analyses of S. cerevisiae yeast populations on grapes have highlighted a significant genetic difference of these populations depending on the appellation. At the estate scale, while the populations involved in spontaneous fermentations are not very distinct over two to three consecutive years, they are clearly different over a longer period of time (>20 years). This confirms that in a given vineyard, populations of yeast fluctuate over time (Börlin et al., 2016). Moreover, there are clearly exchanges of populations between neighboring vineyards. This is probably due to the fact that yeast can disseminate in the environment through various vectors (insects, birds, and humans) to arrive in neighboring parcels of land.

      1 Aigle M., Erbs D. and Moll M. (1984) Am. Soc. Brew. Chem., 42, 1, 1.

      2 Albertin W., Chasseriaud L., Comte G., Panfili A., Delcamp A., Salin F., Marullo P. and Bely M. (2014a) PLoS One, 9, 4, e94246.

      3 Albertin W., Panfili A., Miot‐Sertier C., Goulielmakis A.,Delcamp A., Salin F., Lonvaud‐Funel A., Curtin C. and Masneuf‐Pomarede I. (2014b) Food Microbiol., 42, 188.

      4 Albertin W., Setati M.E., Miot‐Sertier C., Mostert T.T., Colonna‐Ceccaldi B., Coulon J., Girard P., Moine V., Pillet M., Salin F., Bely M., Divol B. and Masneuf‐Pomarede I. (2016) Front. Microbiol., 20, 6, 1569.

      5 Alexandre E.H., Rousseaux I. and Charpentier C. (1994) Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem., 19.

      6 Arroyo‐López F.N., Orlié S., Querol A. and Barrio E. (2009) Int. J. Food Microbiol., 31, 663.

      7 Augustyn O.P.H., Kock J.L.F. and Ferreira D. (1991) Syst. Appl. Microbiol., 15, 105–115.

      8 Ayoub M.J., Legras J.L., Saliba R. and Gaillardin C. (2006) J. Appl. Microbiol., 100, 699.

      9 Baleiras Couto M.M., Reizinho R.G. and Duarte F.L. (2005) Int. J. Microbiol., 102, 49.

      10 Barnett J.A., Delaney M.A., Jones E., Magson A.B. and Winch B. (1972) Arch. Microbiol., 83, 52–55.

      11 Barnett J.A., Payne R.W. and Yarrow D. (1990) Yeast: Characteristics and Identification, 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

      12 Barnett J.A., Payne R.W. and Yarrow D. (2000) Yeasts: Characteristics and Identification, 3rd edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

      13 Barre P. (1978) Killer factor activity under vinification conditions, Vth International Symposium on Yeasts, Montpellier.

      14 Barre P. (1984) Bull. OIV, 57, 635–643.

      15 Barre P. (1992) Le facteur killer. In Les acquisitions récentes de la microbiologie du vin, pp. 63–69(Ed B. Donèche). Tec & Doc, Lavoisier, Paris.

      16 Belda I., Ruiz J., Alonso A., Marquina D. and Santos A. (2017) Toxins, 23, 9.

      17 Belin J.M. (1979) Mycopathologia, 67, 2, 67–81.

      18 Belin J.M. (1981) Biologie des levures liées à la vigne et au vin, Thèse Docteur ès Sciences Naturelles, Université de Dijon.

      19 Bendova O., Richter V., Janderova B. and Haüsler J. (1991) Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 35, 810–812.

      20 Bisson L.F. (1991) Yeasts–metabolism of sugars.In Wine Microbiology and Biotechnology,pp. 55–75 (Ed G.H. Fleet). Harwood Academic Publishers, Chur.

      21 Blondin B. and Vezhinet F. (1988) Rev. Fr. Oenol., 115, 7.

      22 Bokulich N.A., Ohta M., Richardson P.M. and Mills DA. (2013) PLoS One, 8, 6, e66437.

      23 Börlin M. (2015) Diversité et structure de population des levures Saccharomyces cerevisiae à l’échelle du vignoble bordelais: Impact de différents facteurs sur la diversité, Thèse de Doctorat, Université de Bordeaux 2.

      24 Börlin M., Venet P., Claisse O., Salin F., Legras J.L. and Masneuf‐Pomarede I. (2016) Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 82, 2909–2918.

      25 Bouix M., Leveau J.Y.


Скачать книгу