Авторитарная Россия. Бегство от свободы, или Почему у нас не приживается демократия. Владимир Гельман
Skaaning S.-E. Waves of Autocratization and Democratization: A Critical Note // Democratization, 2020, vol. 27, № 8, P.1533–1542 (https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13510347.2020.1799194).
41
См.: Хархордин О. Республика, или Дело публики. – СПб.: Издательство Европейского университета в Санкт-Петербурге, 2020.
42
См.: Полтерович В., Попов В. Демократизация и экономический рост // Общественные науки и современность, 2007, № 2. С. 13–27 (http://ecsocman.hse.ru/data/2010/12/01/1214824190/Polterovich.pdf); критику этого подхода см.: Carothers T. How Democracies Emerge: The Sequencing Fallacy // Journal of Democracy, 2007, vol. 18, № 1. P. 12–27 (https://gsdrc.org/document-library/how-democracies-emerge-the-sequencing-fallacy/).
43
См.: Geddes, Wright, Frantz. Op. cit.
44
O'Donnell G., Schmitter P. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986.
45
Gel'man V. Bringing Actors Back In: Political Choices and Sources of Post-Soviet Regime Dynamics // Post-Soviet Affairs, 2018, vol. 34, № 5. P. 282–296.
46
Bermeo N. On Democratic Backsliding // Journal of Democracy, 2016, vol. 27, № 1. P. 5–19 (https://sites.unimi.it/carbone/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Democratic-backsliding-Bermeo-JOD-2016.pdf).
47
Treisman D. Democratization by Mistake: How the Errors of Autocrats Trigger Transitions to Freer Government // American Political Science Review, 2020, vol. 114, № 3. P. 792–810 (https://www.danieltreisman.org/s/Democracy-by-Mistake-final-mar-30-2020-with-figs.pdf).
48
Capoccia G., Kelemen R.D. The Study of Critical Junctures: Theory, Narrative, and Counterfactuals in Historical Institutionalism // World Politics, 2007, vol. 59, № 3. P. 341–369 (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242426654_The_Study_of_Critical_Junctures_Theory_Narrative_and_Counterfactuals_in_Historical_Institutionalism).
49
См.: Mahoney J. Path Dependence in Historical Sociology // Theory and Society, 2000, vol. 29, № 4. P. 507–548 (http://webarchiv.ethz.ch/soms/teaching/OppFall09/MahoneyPathDependence.pdf).
50
Впервые эту параллель провел Сэмюэл Хантингтон. См.: Huntington S.P. Political Development and Political Decay // World Politics. 1965, vol. 17, № 3. P. 416.
51
О причинах и механизмах краха советской системы см., в частности: Гайдар Е. Гибель империи: Уроки для современной России. – М.: РОССПЭН, 2006; Коткин С. Предотвращенный Армагеддон: Распад Советского Союза, 1970–2000. – М.: Новое литературное обозрение, 2018.
52
Beissinger M.R., Kotkin S. (eds.) Historical Legacies of Communism in Russia and Eastern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
53
См.: Offe C. Capitalism by Democratic Design? Democratic Theory Facing the Triple Transition in East Central Europe // Social Research, 1991, vol. 58, № 4. P. 865–892 (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283560322_Capitalism_by_Democratic_Design_Democratic_Theory_Facing_the_Triple_Transition_in_East_Central_Europe); Przeworski A. Op. cit., Chapter 4. (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274857109_Democracy_and_the_Market_Political_and_Economic_Reforms_in_Eastern_Europe_and_Latin_America).
54
Среди обилия литературы об экономических реформах 1990-х годов в России см., в частности: Shelifer A., Treisman D. Without a Map: Political Tactics and Economic Reform in Russia. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000; Guriev S., Rachinsky A. The Role of Oligarchs in Russian Capitalism // Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2005, vol. 19, № 1. P. 31–50 (https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/0895330053147994); Åslund A. Russia's Capitalist Revolution: Why Market Reform Succeeded and Democracy Failed. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics, 2007.
55
Fish M.S. Democracy from Scratch: Opposition and Regime in the New Russian Revolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995; Urban M., with Igrunov V., Mitrokhin S. The Rebirth of Politics in Russia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
56
Жестким курсом: аналитическая записка Ленинградской ассоциации социально-экономических наук // Век ХХ и мир, 1990, № 6. С. 15–19. http://www.r-reforms.ru/indexpub42.htm.
57
Robertson G.B. The Politics of Protest in Hybrid Regimes. Managing Dissent in Post-Communist Russia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
58
См.: Rose R., Mishler W., Munro N. Popular Support for an Undemocratic Regime: The Changing Views of Russians. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011, Treisman D. Presidential Popularity in a Hybrid Regime: Russia under Yeltsin and Putin // American Journal of Political Science, 2011, vol. 55, № 3. P. 590–609 (