A Companion to Chomsky. Группа авторов
N. 2018. Two notions of modularity. In On Concepts, Modules, and Language: Cognitive Science at Its Core, edited by R. G. de Almeida, and L. R. Gleitman, 25–40. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35 Chomsky, N., Á. J. Gallego, and D. Ott. 2019. Generative grammar and the Faculty of Language: Insights, questions, and challenges. Catalan Journal of Linguistics Special Issue: 229–261.
36 Chomsky, N., and H. Lasnik. 1977. Filters and control. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 425–504.
37 Chomsky, N., and H. Lasnik. 1993. The theory of Principles and Parameters. In Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, edited by J. Jacobs, A. von Stechow, W. Sternefeld, and T. Venneman, 506–569. New York: Walter de Gruyter.
38 Cinque, G. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross‐Linguistic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
39 Collins, C. 2002. Eliminating labels. In Derivation and Explanation in the Minimalist Program, edited by S. D. Epstein, and T. D. Seely, 42–64. Malden: Blackwell.
40 Collins, C. 2017. Merge(X,Y) = {X,Y}. In Labels and Roots, edited by L. S. Bauke and A. Blümel, 47–68. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
41 Corbett, G. G. 1991. Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42 van Craenenbroeck, J., and J. Merchant. 2013. Ellipsis phenomena. In The Cambridge Handbook of Generative Syntax, edited by M. den Dikken, 701–745. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43 D'Alessandro, R. 2015. Null subjects. In Contemporary Linguistic Parameters, edited by A. Fábregas, J. Mateu, and M. T. Putnam, 201–226. London: Bloomsbury Press.
44 den Dikken, M., and A. Lahne. 2013. The locality of syntactic dependencies. In The Cambridge Handbook of Generative Syntax, edited by M. den Dikken, 655–698. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45 Dougherty, R. C. 1973. A survey of linguistic methods and arguments. Foundations of Language 10: 432–490.
46 Embick, D. 2015. The Morpheme: A Theoretical Introduction. Berlin: Mouton deGruyter.
47 Embick, D., and A. Marantz. 2008. Architecture and Blocking. Linguistic Inquiry 29: 1–53.
48 Embick, D., and R. Noyer. 2007. Distributed Morphology and the syntax‐morphology interface. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces, edited by G. Ramchand, and C. Reiss, 289–324. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
49 Fitch, W. T. 2010. The Evolution of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50 Fodor, J. 1983. The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.
51 Fodor, J. 2000. The Mind Doesn't Work That Way. Cambridge: MIT Press.
52 Freidin, R. 2012. A brief history of generative grammar. In The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Language, edited by D. Fara Graf and G. Russell, 895–916. London: Routledge.
53 Freidin, R., and H. Lasnik. 2011. Some roots of minimalism. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism, edited by C. Boeckx, 1–26. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
54 Freidin, R., and J‐R. Vergnaud. 2001. Exquisite connections: Some remarks on the evolution of linguistic theory. Lingua 111: 128–172.
55 Gallego, Á. J. 2012. Introduction: A framework of phases for linguistic theory. In Phases: Developing the Framework, edited by Á. J. Gallego, 9–44. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
56 Gould, S. J. 2002. The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
57 Grimstad, M. Berg, B. Ramsevik Riksem, T. Lohndal, and T. A. Åfarli. 2018. Lexicalist vs. exoskeletal approaches to language mixing. The Linguistic Review 35: 187–218.
58 Haegeman, L. 1994. Introduction to Government and Binding Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
59 Hankamer, J. 1973. Unacceptable ambiguity. Linguistic Inquiry 4: 17–68.
60 Harris, Z. 1951. Methods in Structural Linguistics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
61 Haspelmath, M. 2006. Against Markedness (And What to Replace It With). Journal of Linguistics 42: 25–70.
62 Haspelmath, M. 2008. Parametric versus functional explanations of syntactic universals. In The Limits of Syntactic Variation, edited by Theresa Biberauer, 75–107. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
63 Haugen, E. 1953. The Norwegian Language in America. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.
64 Hauser, M. D., N. Chomsky, and W. T. Fitch. 2002. The Faculty of Language: What Is It, Who Has It, and How Did it Evolve? Science 298: 1569–1579.
65 Hornstein, N. 2009. A Theory of Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
66 Hornstein, N. 2013. Three Grades of Grammatical Involvement: Syntax from a Minimalist Perspective. Mind & Language 28: 392–420.
67 Hornstein, N., J. Nunes, and K. K. Grohmann. 2005. Understanding Minimalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
68 Jaeggli, O., and N. Hyams. 1988. Morphological uniformity and the setting of the null subject parameter. In Proceedings of NELS 18, edited by J. Blevins, and J. Carter, 238–253. Amherst: GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
69 Judy, T., and J. Rothman. 2010. From a superset ot a subset grammar and the semantic compensation hypothesis: subject pronoun and anaphora resolution evidence in L2 English. In BUCLD 34: Proceedings of the 34th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, edited by K. Franich, K. M. Iserman, and L. L. Keil, 197–208. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
70 Kayne, R. S. 1980. Extensions of binding and case‐marking. Linguistic Inquiry 11: 75–96.
71 Koizumi, M. 1995. Phrase structure in minimalist syntax. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
72 Kramer, R. 2015. The Morphosyntax of Gender. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
73 Kramer, R. 2016. The location of gender features in the syntax. Language and Linguistics Compass 10: 661–677.
74 Lakatos, I. 1968. Criticism and the methodology of scientific research programmes. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 69: 149–186.
75 Lakatos, I. 1970. Falsifications and the methodology of scientific research programs. In Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, edited by Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave, 91–195. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
76 Lakoff, G. 1970. Global rules. Language 46: 627–639.
77 Lasnik, H. 1981. Restricting the theory of transformations. In Explanation in Linguistics, edited by N. Hornstein, and D. Lightfoot, 152–173. London: Longmans.
78 Lasnik, H. 1999. Minimalist Analysis. Malden: Blackwell.
79 Lasnik, H. 2000. Syntactic Structures Revisited: Contemporary Lectures on Classic Transformational Theory. Cambridge: MIT Press.
80 Lasnik, H. 2005. Grammar, levels, and biology. In The Cambridge Companion to Chomsky, edited by J. McGilvray, 60–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
81 Lasnik, H. 2008. On the Development of Case Theory: Triumphs and Challenges. In Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory, edited by C. Otero, R. Freidin, and M‐L. Zubizarreta, 17‐41. Cambridge: MIT Press.
82 Lasnik, H., and T. Lohndal. 2010. Government‐Binding/Principles & Parameters theory. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 1: 40–50.
83 Lasnik, H., and T. Lohndal. 2013. Brief overview of the history of generative grammar. In The Cambridge Handbook of Generative Syntax, edited by M. den Dikken, 26–60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
84 Lasnik, H., and M. Saito. 1991. On the subject of infinitives. In Papers from the 27th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, edited by L. M. Dobrin, L. Nichols, and R. M. Rodriguez, 324–343. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.
85 Lasnik, H., and J. Uriagereka. 2005. A Course in Minimalist Syntax. Malden: Blackwell.
86 Lohndal, T. 2013. Generative grammar and language mixing. Theoretical