High-Density and De-Densified Smart Campus Communications. Daniel Minoli

High-Density and De-Densified Smart Campus Communications - Daniel  Minoli


Скачать книгу
within the 30 000 ft2 area may have a higher concentration of semi‐stationary users). If the busy hour concentration of people is 150 people, then there will be 1 person per 200 ft2 (a 10 × 20 feet area); however, there may be overcrowding situations where the concentration is comparable to the design goals depicted in Table 1.2. See Table 1.3 for the top 30 airports in the United States. Internationally, the Beijing Capital International Airport (Chaoyang‐Shunyi, Beijing, China) is the second largest in the world, following the Hartsfield–Jackson Atlanta International Airport, with about 50 million passengers per year as of 2018; Tokyo Haneda Airport (Ōta, Tokyo, Japan) had 41 million passengers; Dubai International Airport (Garhoud, Dubai, United Arab Emirates) had 42 million passengers; and London Heathrow Airport (Hillingdon, London, United Kingdom) had 39 million passengers.

Photo depicts a gate area at Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport is crowded with travelers awaiting Delta flight 1420 to Atlanta Saturday, 14 March 2020.

      (Courtesy: John Scalzi, Photographer).

      1.2.2 Pre‐pandemic/Long‐term Requirements for Stadiums

      For stadiums, a target of one million connections per square kilometer (also definable as 1 connection per m2 or one connection every 10 ft2) has been suggested by some researchers [2]. In the bleachers, the density could be high, even multiple individuals (say 2–3) every 10 ft2. Requirements include high‐capacity data and video access, IoT automation support, which also includes surveillance. The requirements are generally consistent with Table 1.2, with the coverage extending to parking lots. The services span more tightly defined time intervals (as contrasted to airports), possibly giving rise to a challenge in achieving certain goals for the Return on Investment on the infrastructure and the core‐network connectivity. The communication session may span the entire sporting event and a specified interval before and after the event.

      1.2.3 Pre‐pandemic/Long‐term Requirements for Convention Centers

Rank (2018) Airports (Large Hubs) Major City Served, State 2018 Passengers (in M) (Approx.) Ave Daily (365 days) Busy Hour (0.05,0.1,0.2,0.1,0.2,0.1,0.2,0.05) Gates Ave People per Gate at BH
1 Hartsfield–Jackson Atlanta International Airport Atlanta, GA 52 142 100 28 420 192 148
2 Los Angeles International Airport Los Angeles, CA 43 116 786 23 357 128 182
3 O'Hare International Airport Chicago, IL 40 109 246 21 849 191 114
4 Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport Dallas, TX 33 89 865 17 973 182 99
5 Denver International Airport Denver, CO 31 85 928 17 186 111 155
6 John F. Kennedy International Airport New York, NY 31 83 675 16 735 128 131
7 San Francisco International Airport San Francisco, CA 28 76 148 15 230 115 132
8 Seattle–Tacoma International Airport Seattle, WA 25 68 204 13 641
9 McCarran International Airport Las Vegas, NV 24 64 809 12 962
10 Orlando
Скачать книгу
Librs.Net