Liquid Crystals. Iam-Choon Khoo
Figure 3.10. Stresses acting on opposite planes of an elementary volume of fluid.
Let us ignore the external field for the moment. The formulation of the equation of motion for a fluid element is complete once we identify the viscous forces. Note that, in analogy to the pressure gradient term, the viscous force
(3.55)
Accordingly, we may rewrite Eq. (3.54) as
where summation over repeated indices is implicit.
By consideration of the fact that there is no force acting when the fluid velocity is a constant, the stress tensor is taken to be linear in the gradients of the velocity (see Figure 3.10), that is,
The proportionality constant η in Eq. (3.57) is the viscosity coefficient (in units of g cm−1 S−1). Note that for fluid under uniform rotation
Equation (3.56), together with Eq. (3.57), forms the basis for studying the hydrodynamics of an isotropic fluid. Note that since the viscosity for
(3.58)
which is usually referred to as the Navier–Stokes equation for an incompressible fluid.
3.5.2. General Stress Tensor for Nematic Liquid Crystals
The general theoretical framework for describing the hydrodynamics of liquid crystals has been developed principally by Leslie [16] and Ericksen [17]. Their approaches account for the fact that the stress tensor depends not only on the velocity gradients but also on the orientation and rotation of the director. Accordingly, the stress tensor is given by
where the Aαβs are defined by
Note that all the other terms on the right‐hand side of Eq. (3.59) involve the director orientation, except the fourth term, α4Aαβ.This is the same term as that for an isotropic fluid (cf. Eq. [3.57]), that is, α4 = 2η.
Therefore, in this formalism, we have six so‐called Leslie coefficients, α1,α2,…, α6, which have the dimension of viscosity coefficients. It was shown by Parodi [18] that
(3.61)