Origin of Cultivated Plants. Alphonse de Candolle

Origin of Cultivated Plants - Alphonse de Candolle


Скачать книгу
by the wayside, and thus become half-naturalized in hot countries as well as in Europe. Hence the extreme difficulty in distinguishing the species, and above all in guessing or proving their origin. The species most nearly akin to A. gangeticus appear to be Asiatic.

       A. gangeticus is said by trustworthy authorities to be wild in Egypt and Abyssinia;439 but this is perhaps only the result of such naturalization as I spoke of just now. The existence of numerous varieties and of different names in India, render its Indian origin most probable.

      The Japanese cultivate as vegetables A. caudatus, A. mangostanus, and A. melancholicus (or gangeticus) of Linnæus,440 but there is no proof that any of them are indigenous. In Java A. polystachyus, Blume, is cultivated; it is very common among rubbish, by the wayside, etc.441

      I shall speak presently of the species grown for the seed.

      LeekAllium ampeloprasum, var. Porrum.

      According to the careful monograph by J. Gay,442 the leek, as early writers443 suspected, is only a cultivated variety of Allium ampeloprasum of Linnæus, so common in the East, and in the Mediterranean region, especially in Algeria, which in Central Europe sometimes becomes naturalized in vineyards and round ancient cultivations.444 Gay seems to have mistrusted the indications of the floras of the south of Europe, for, contrary to his method with other species of which he gives the localities out of Algeria, he only quotes in the present case the Algerian localities; admitting, however, the identity of name in the authors for other countries.

      The cultivated variety of Porrum has not been found wild. It is only mentioned in doubtful localities, such as vineyards, gardens, etc. Ledebour445 indicates for A. ampeloprasum the borders of the Crimea, and the provinces to the south of the Caucasus. Wallich brought a specimen from Kamaon, in India,446 but we cannot be sure that it was wild. The works on Cochin-China (Loureiro), China (Bretschneider), and Japan (Franchet and Savatier) make no mention of it.

Article II.Fodder

      LucernMedicago sativa, Linnæus.

      The lucern was known to the Greeks and Romans. They called it in Greek medicai, in Latin medica, or herba medica, because it had been brought from Media at the time of the Persian war, about 470 years before the Christian era.447 The Romans often cultivated it, at any rate from the beginning of the first or second century. Cato does not speak of it,448 but it is mentioned by Varro, Columella, and Virgil. De Gasparin449 notices that Crescenz, in 1478, does not mention it in Italy, and that in 1711 Tull had not seen it beyond the Alps. Targioni, however, who could not be mistaken on this head, says that the cultivation of lucern was maintained in Italy, especially in Tuscany, from ancient times.450 It is rare in modern Greece.451 French cultivators have often given to the lucern the name of sainfoin, which belongs properly to Onobrychis sativa; and this transposition still exists, for instance in the neighbourhood of Geneva. The name lucern has been supposed to come from the valley of Luzerne, in Piedmont; but there is another and more probable origin. The Spaniards had an old name, eruye, mentioned by J. Bauhin,452 and the Catalans call it userdas453 whence perhaps the patois name in the south of France, laouzerdo, nearly akin to luzerne. It was so commonly cultivated in Spain that the Italians have sometimes called it herba spagna.454 The Spaniards have, besides the names already given, mielga, or melga, which appears to come from Medica, but they principally used names derived from the Arabic —alfafa, alfasafat, alfalfa. In the thirteenth century, the famous physician Ebn Baithar, who wrote at Malaga, uses the Arab word fisfisat, which he derives from the Persian isfist.455 It will be seen that, if we are to trust to the common names, the origin of the plant would be either in Spain, Piedmont, or Persia. Fortunately botanists can furnish direct and possible proofs of the original home of the species.

      It has been found wild, with every appearance of an indigenous plant, in several provinces of Anatolia, to the south of the Caucasus, in several parts of Persia, in Afghanistan, in Beluchistan,456 and in Kashmir.457 In the south of Russia, a locality mentioned by some authors, it is perhaps the result of cultivation as well as in the south of Europe. The Greeks may, therefore, have introduced the plant from Asia Minor as well as from India, which extended from the north of Persia.

      This origin of the lucern, which is well established, makes me note as a singular fact that no Sanskrit name is known.458 Clover and sainfoin have none either, which leads us to suppose that the Aryans had no artificial meadows.

      SainfoinHedysarum Onobrychis, Linnæus; Onobrychis sativa, Lamarck.

      This leguminous plant, of which the usefulness in the dry and chalky soils of temperate regions is incontestable, has not been long in cultivation. The Greeks did not grow it, and their descendants have not introduced it into their agriculture to this day.459 The plant called Onobrychis by Dioscorides and Pliny, is Onobrychis Caput-Galli of modern botanists,460 a species wild in Greece and elsewhere, which is not cultivated. The sainfoin, or lupinella of the Italians, was highly esteemed as fodder in the south of France in the time of Olivier de Serres,461 that is to say, in the sixteenth century; but in Italy it was only in the eighteenth century that this cultivation spread, particularly in Tuscany.462

      Sainfoin is a herbaceous plant, which grows wild in the temperate parts of Europe, to the south of the Caucasus, round the Caspian Sea,463 and even beyond Lake Baikal.464 In the south of Europe it grows only on the hills. Gussone does not reckon it among the wild species of Sicily, nor Moris among those of Sardinia, nor Munby among those of Algeria.

      No Sanskrit, Persian, or Arabic names are known. Everything tends to show that the cultivation of this plant originated in the south of France as late perhaps as the fifteenth century.

      French Honeysuckle, or Spanish SainfoinHedysarum coronarium, Linnæus.

      The cultivation of this leguminous plant, akin to the sainfoin, and of which a good illustration may be found in the Flora des Serres et des Jardins, vol. xiii. pl. 1382, has been diffused in modern times through Italy, Sicily, Malta, and the Balearic Isles.465 Marquis Grimaldi, who first pointed it out to cultivators in 1766, had seen it at Seminara, in Lower Calabria; De Gasparin466 recommends it for Algeria, and it is probable that cultivators under similar conditions in Australia, at the Cape, in South America or Mexico, would do well to try it. In the neighbourhood of Orange, in Algeria, the plant did not survive the cold of 6° centigrade.

       Hedysarum coronarium grows in Italy from Genoa to Sicily and Sardinia,467 in the south of Spain468 and in Algeria,Скачать книгу


<p>439</p>

Boissier, Flora Orientalis, iv. p. 990; Schweinfurth and Ascherson, Aufzählung, etc., p. 289.

<p>440</p>

Franchet and Savatier, Enum. Plant. Japoniæ, i. p. 390.

<p>441</p>

Hasskarl, Plant. Javan. Rariores, p. 431.

<p>442</p>

Gay, Ann. des Sc. Nat., 3rd series, vol. viii.

<p>443</p>

Linnæus, Species Pl.; De Candolle, Fl. Franç., iii. p. 219.

<p>444</p>

Koch, Synopsis Fl. Germ.; Babington, Man. of Brit. Bot.; English Bot., etc.

<p>445</p>

Ledebour, Flora Ross., iv. p. 163.

<p>446</p>

Baker, Journal of Bot., 1874, p. 295.

<p>447</p>

Strabo, xii. p. 560; Pliny, bk. xviii. c. 16.

<p>448</p>

Hehn, Culturpflanzen, etc., p. 355.

<p>449</p>

Gasparin, Cours d’Agric., iv. p. 424.

<p>450</p>

Targioni-Tozzetti, Cenni Storici, p. 34.

<p>451</p>

Fraas, Synopsis Fl. Class., p. 63; Heldreich, Die Nutzpflanzen Griechenlands, p. 70.

<p>452</p>

Bauhin, Hist. Plant., ii. p. 381.

<p>453</p>

Colmeiro, Catal.

<p>454</p>

Tozzetti, Dizion. Bot.

<p>455</p>

Ebn Baithar, Heil und Nahrungsmittel, translated from Arabic by Sontheimer, vol. ii. p. 257.

<p>456</p>

Boissier, Fl. Orient., ii. p. 94.

<p>457</p>

Royle, Ill. Himal., p. 197.

<p>458</p>

Piddington, Index.

<p>459</p>

Heldreich, Nutzpflanzen Griechenlands, p. 72.

<p>460</p>

Fraas, Synopsis Fl. Class., p. 58; Lenz, Bot. der Alten Gr. und Röm., p. 731.

<p>461</p>

O. de Serres, Théâtre de l’Agric., p. 242.

<p>462</p>

Targioni-Tozzetti, Cenni Storici, p. 34.

<p>463</p>

Ledebour, Fl. Ross., i. p. 708; Boissier, Fl. Or., p. 532.

<p>464</p>

Turczaninow, Flora Baical. Dahur., i. p. 340.

<p>465</p>

Targioni-Tozzetti, Cenni Storici, p. 35; Marès and Virgineix, Catal. des Baléares, p. 100.

<p>466</p>

De Gasparin, Cours d’Agric., iv. p. 472.

<p>467</p>

Bertoloni, Flora Ital., viii. p. 6.

<p>468</p>

Willkomm and Lange, Prodr. Fl. Hisp., iii. p. 262.