Protocol Systems A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk
the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
75. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Protocol Systems results are met?
<--- Score
76. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
77. Is special Protocol Systems user knowledge required?
<--- Score
78. Who approved the Protocol Systems scope?
<--- Score
79. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
80. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
81. Has the Protocol Systems work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
82. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
83. Is the Protocol Systems scope manageable?
<--- Score
84. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
85. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
86. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
87. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
88. What Protocol Systems services do you require?
<--- Score
89. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
90. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
91. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
92. Are accountability and ownership for Protocol Systems clearly defined?
<--- Score
93. Will team members regularly document their Protocol Systems work?
<--- Score
94. What are the Protocol Systems use cases?
<--- Score
95. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
96. Is Protocol Systems required?
<--- Score
97. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
98. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
99. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
100. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
101. What is in scope?
<--- Score
102. Who is gathering Protocol Systems information?
<--- Score
103. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
104. What are the Protocol Systems tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
105. Is there any additional Protocol Systems definition of success?
<--- Score
106. What are (control) requirements for Protocol Systems Information?
<--- Score
107. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
108. Is the scope of Protocol Systems defined?
<--- Score
109. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
110. Is Protocol Systems linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
111. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
112. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Protocol Systems leverage and how?
<--- Score
113. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
114. Do you have a Protocol Systems success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
115. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
116. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
117. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
118. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
119. Will a Protocol Systems production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
120. What would be the goal or target for a Protocol Systems’s improvement team?
<--- Score
121. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Protocol Systems? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
122. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
123. Is there a Protocol Systems management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
124. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
125. How have you defined all Protocol Systems requirements first?
<--- Score
126. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
127. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
128. What sources do you use to gather information for a Protocol Systems study?
<--- Score
129.