Information Modelling A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

Information Modelling A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk


Скачать книгу
Score

      9. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

      <--- Score

      10. Is the work to date meeting requirements?

      <--- Score

      11. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      12. What is the worst case scenario?

      <--- Score

      13. How are consistent Information Modelling definitions important?

      <--- Score

      14. What Information Modelling requirements should be gathered?

      <--- Score

      15. What information should you gather?

      <--- Score

      16. Has your scope been defined?

      <--- Score

      17. Is special Information Modelling user knowledge required?

      <--- Score

      18. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      19. Are task requirements clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      20. What system do you use for gathering Information Modelling information?

      <--- Score

      21. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?

      <--- Score

      22. How do you gather Information Modelling requirements?

      <--- Score

      23. What sources do you use to gather information for a Information Modelling study?

      <--- Score

      24. When is/was the Information Modelling start date?

      <--- Score

      25. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      26. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?

      <--- Score

      27. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Information Modelling brings?

      <--- Score

      28. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

      <--- Score

      29. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      30. What was the context?

      <--- Score

      31. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Information Modelling work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      32. Are all requirements met?

      <--- Score

      33. The political context: who holds power?

      <--- Score

      34. Is Information Modelling linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?

      <--- Score

      35. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?

      <--- Score

      36. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Information Modelling? If so, when did it change and why?

      <--- Score

      37. Have specific policy objectives been defined?

      <--- Score

      38. What are the Information Modelling use cases?

      <--- Score

      39. Is the scope of Information Modelling defined?

      <--- Score

      40. How does the Information Modelling manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      41. How have you defined all Information Modelling requirements first?

      <--- Score

      42. Are resources adequate for the scope?

      <--- Score

      43. What is the definition of Information Modelling excellence?

      <--- Score

      44. What are the requirements for audit information?

      <--- Score

      45. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?

      <--- Score

      46. How do you hand over Information Modelling context?

      <--- Score

      47. What scope to assess?

      <--- Score

      48. Why are you doing Information Modelling and what is the scope?

      <--- Score

      49. What are (control) requirements for Information Modelling Information?

      <--- Score

      50. How and when will the baselines be defined?

      <--- Score

      51. Are there different segments of customers?

      <--- Score

      52. How often are the team meetings?

      <--- Score

      53. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?

      <--- Score

      54. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

      <--- Score

      55. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      56. Does the team have regular meetings?

      <--- Score

      57. What would be the goal or target for a Information Modelling’s improvement team?

      <--- Score

      58. What defines best in class?

      <--- Score

      59. What constraints exist that might impact the team?

      <--- Score

      60. Who is gathering information?

      <--- Score

      61. How would you define Information Modelling leadership?

      <--- Score

      62. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

      <--- Score

      63. How did the Information Modelling manager receive input to the development of a Information Modelling improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

      <--- Score

      64. What sort of initial information to gather?

      <--- Score

      65. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <---


Скачать книгу