Power System Simulation A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk
process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
119. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
120. What gets examined?
<--- Score
121. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
122. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
123. How do you gather Power system simulation requirements?
<--- Score
124. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
125. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Power system simulation changes?
<--- Score
126. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
127. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?
<--- Score
128. What happens if Power system simulation’s scope changes?
<--- Score
129. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
130. What is the definition of Power system simulation excellence?
<--- Score
131. Has a Power system simulation requirement not been met?
<--- Score
132. Is there any additional Power system simulation definition of success?
<--- Score
133. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
134. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
135. Are the Power system simulation requirements complete?
<--- Score
136. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
137. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Power system simulation work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
138. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
139. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Power system simulation? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
140. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?
<--- Score
141. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Power system simulation?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Power system simulation Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Have design-to-cost goals been established?
<--- Score
2. When should you bother with diagrams?
<--- Score
3. How frequently do you track Power system simulation measures?
<--- Score
4. Do you effectively measure and reward individual and team performance?
<--- Score
5. What are your operating costs?
<--- Score
6. How do you aggregate measures across priorities?
<--- Score
7. Where is it measured?
<--- Score
8. How do you verify and validate the Power system simulation data?
<--- Score
9. What are the costs of delaying Power system simulation action?
<--- Score
10. Do you aggressively reward and promote the people who have the biggest impact on creating excellent Power system simulation services/products?
<--- Score
11. What causes innovation to fail or succeed in your organization?
<--- Score
12. How can you manage cost down?
<--- Score
13. How do you verify performance?
<--- Score
14. What could cause delays in the schedule?
<--- Score
15. How will you measure success?
<--- Score
16. What causes mismanagement?
<--- Score
17. What measurements are possible, practicable and meaningful?
<--- Score
18. How do you control the overall costs of your work processes?
<--- Score
19. How frequently do you verify your Power system simulation strategy?
<--- Score
20. How much does it cost?
<--- Score
21. Are the Power system simulation benefits worth its costs?
<--- Score
22. What are you verifying?
<--- Score
23. What are the Power system simulation key cost drivers?
<--- Score
24. How do you verify your resources?
<--- Score
25. Will Power system simulation have an impact on current business continuity, disaster recovery processes and/or infrastructure?
<--- Score
26. Are missed Power system simulation opportunities costing your organization money?
<--- Score
27. Is the solution cost-effective?
<--- Score
28. Are actual costs in line with budgeted costs?
<--- Score
29. How are measurements made?
<--- Score
30.