Fault Isolation A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

Fault Isolation A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk


Скачать книгу
requirements of Fault isolation activities?

      <--- Score

      17. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Fault isolation results are met?

      <--- Score

      18. Do you have a Fault isolation success story or case study ready to tell and share?

      <--- Score

      19. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

      <--- Score

      20. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Fault isolation brings?

      <--- Score

      21. Is there a critical path to deliver Fault isolation results?

      <--- Score

      22. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?

      <--- Score

      23. What gets examined?

      <--- Score

      24. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?

      <--- Score

      25. What is out of scope?

      <--- Score

      26. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?

      <--- Score

      27. What Fault isolation services do you require?

      <--- Score

      28. Who are the Fault isolation improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?

      <--- Score

      29. How do you manage changes in Fault isolation requirements?

      <--- Score

      30. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

      <--- Score

      31. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

      <--- Score

      32. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Fault isolation changes?

      <--- Score

      33. Are task requirements clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      34. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?

      <--- Score

      35. Do you all define Fault isolation in the same way?

      <--- Score

      36. Who approved the Fault isolation scope?

      <--- Score

      37. What is the definition of success?

      <--- Score

      38. Is the Fault isolation scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      39. Are required metrics defined, what are they?

      <--- Score

      40. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

      <--- Score

      41. Has the Fault isolation work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      42. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      43. Is there a clear Fault isolation case definition?

      <--- Score

      44. Is Fault isolation linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?

      <--- Score

      45. How can the value of Fault isolation be defined?

      <--- Score

      46. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?

      <--- Score

      47. What are the tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      48. Are accountability and ownership for Fault isolation clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      49. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?

      <--- Score

      50. Will team members regularly document their Fault isolation work?

      <--- Score

      51. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.

      <--- Score

      52. How do you think the partners involved in Fault isolation would have defined success?

      <--- Score

      53. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?

      <--- Score

      54. How does the Fault isolation manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      55. Is the scope of Fault isolation defined?

      <--- Score

      56. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Fault isolation goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

      <--- Score

      57. What Fault isolation requirements should be gathered?

      <--- Score

      58. Are resources adequate for the scope?

      <--- Score

      59. What is the scope?

      <--- Score

      60. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?

      <--- Score

      61. When is/was the Fault isolation start date?

      <--- Score

      62. Who is gathering Fault isolation information?

      <--- Score

      63. Is Fault isolation currently on schedule according to the plan?

      <--- Score

      64. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?

      <--- Score

      65. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?

      <--- Score

      66. What are (control) requirements for Fault isolation Information?

      <--- Score

      67. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

      <--- Score

      68. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Fault isolation work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      69. Are the Fault isolation requirements testable?

      <--- Score

      70. When is the estimated completion date?

      <--- Score

      71. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?

      <---


Скачать книгу