Systems Architecture Service A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk
<--- Score
114. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
115. What are the Systems Architecture Service tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
116. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
117. Is the Systems Architecture Service scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
118. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
119. What are the record-keeping requirements of Systems Architecture Service activities?
<--- Score
120. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
121. Who is gathering Systems Architecture Service information?
<--- Score
122. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
123. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
124. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
125. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
126. What are (control) requirements for Systems Architecture Service Information?
<--- Score
127. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
128. Has a Systems Architecture Service requirement not been met?
<--- Score
129. What is the definition of Systems Architecture Service excellence?
<--- Score
130. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
131. Is there a critical path to deliver Systems Architecture Service results?
<--- Score
132. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
133. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
134. What is in scope?
<--- Score
135. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
136. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Systems Architecture Service leverage and how?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Systems Architecture Service Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. How are costs allocated?
<--- Score
2. Has a cost center been established?
<--- Score
3. Do the benefits outweigh the costs?
<--- Score
4. How do you verify and develop ideas and innovations?
<--- Score
5. Is the solution cost-effective?
<--- Score
6. How do you prevent mis-estimating cost?
<--- Score
7. How do you stay flexible and focused to recognize larger Systems Architecture Service results?
<--- Score
8. What causes investor action?
<--- Score
9. How sensitive must the Systems Architecture Service strategy be to cost?
<--- Score
10. What causes innovation to fail or succeed in your organization?
<--- Score
11. Is the cost worth the Systems Architecture Service effort ?
<--- Score
12. Are actual costs in line with budgeted costs?
<--- Score
13. How do you verify and validate the Systems Architecture Service data?
<--- Score
14. How do you verify the Systems Architecture Service requirements quality?
<--- Score
15. How do you control the overall costs of your work processes?
<--- Score
16. Are the Systems Architecture Service benefits worth its costs?
<--- Score
17. Which measures and indicators matter?
<--- Score
18. At what cost?
<--- Score
19. What does verifying compliance entail?
<--- Score
20. Do you verify that corrective actions were taken?
<--- Score
21. Is it possible to estimate the impact of unanticipated complexity such as wrong or failed assumptions, feedback, etcetera on proposed reforms?
<--- Score
22. Are there any easy-to-implement alternatives to Systems Architecture Service? Sometimes other solutions are available that do not require the cost implications of a full-blown project?
<--- Score
23. What is your Systems Architecture Service quality cost segregation study?
<--- Score
24. How do you quantify and qualify impacts?
<--- Score
25. How frequently do you track Systems Architecture Service measures?
<--- Score
26. How will effects be measured?
<--- Score
27. Does the Systems Architecture Service task fit the client’s priorities?
<---