All Source Intelligence A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk
Score
31. What methods are feasible and acceptable to estimate the impact of reforms?
<--- Score
32. How will measures be used to manage and adapt?
<--- Score
33. Have you made assumptions about the shape of the future, particularly its impact on your customers and competitors?
<--- Score
34. How frequently do you track All-source intelligence measures?
<--- Score
35. How will you measure success?
<--- Score
36. What causes extra work or rework?
<--- Score
37. The approach of traditional All-source intelligence works for detail complexity but is focused on a systematic approach rather than an understanding of the nature of systems themselves, what approach will permit your organization to deal with the kind of unpredictable emergent behaviors that dynamic complexity can introduce?
<--- Score
38. Are actual costs in line with budgeted costs?
<--- Score
39. What happens if cost savings do not materialize?
<--- Score
40. What are the uncertainties surrounding estimates of impact?
<--- Score
41. What are your customers expectations and measures?
<--- Score
42. What could cause delays in the schedule?
<--- Score
43. Are missed All-source intelligence opportunities costing your organization money?
<--- Score
44. How do you verify and develop ideas and innovations?
<--- Score
45. How do you prevent mis-estimating cost?
<--- Score
46. How do you verify All-source intelligence completeness and accuracy?
<--- Score
47. What are you verifying?
<--- Score
48. What are hidden All-source intelligence quality costs?
<--- Score
49. Are you able to realize any cost savings?
<--- Score
50. Are the measurements objective?
<--- Score
51. Which All-source intelligence impacts are significant?
<--- Score
52. Have design-to-cost goals been established?
<--- Score
53. How do you quantify and qualify impacts?
<--- Score
54. What details are required of the All-source intelligence cost structure?
<--- Score
55. What could cause you to change course?
<--- Score
56. When a disaster occurs, who gets priority?
<--- Score
57. What are your key All-source intelligence organizational performance measures, including key short and longer-term financial measures?
<--- Score
58. What are the All-source intelligence investment costs?
<--- Score
59. Are supply costs steady or fluctuating?
<--- Score
60. How are costs allocated?
<--- Score
61. Was a business case (cost/benefit) developed?
<--- Score
62. How do you verify your resources?
<--- Score
63. Which costs should be taken into account?
<--- Score
64. How can you reduce costs?
<--- Score
65. How will your organization measure success?
<--- Score
66. How do you verify and validate the All-source intelligence data?
<--- Score
67. How do you stay flexible and focused to recognize larger All-source intelligence results?
<--- Score
68. How to cause the change?
<--- Score
69. Are you aware of what could cause a problem?
<--- Score
70. Where is the cost?
<--- Score
71. How can a All-source intelligence test verify your ideas or assumptions?
<--- Score
72. Is there an opportunity to verify requirements?
<--- Score
73. How are measurements made?
<--- Score
74. Do you have an issue in getting priority?
<--- Score
75. What measurements are possible, practicable and meaningful?
<--- Score
76. Have you included everything in your All-source intelligence cost models?
<--- Score
77. Are indirect costs charged to the All-source intelligence program?
<--- Score
78. Why do the measurements/indicators matter?
<--- Score
79. How is progress measured?
<--- Score
80. How much does it cost?
<--- Score
81. Do you verify that corrective actions were taken?
<--- Score
82. What do you measure and why?
<--- Score
83. What potential environmental factors impact the All-source intelligence effort?
<--- Score
84. At what cost?
<--- Score
85. Why a All-source intelligence focus?
<--- Score
86. Do the benefits outweigh the costs?
<--- Score
87. What do people want to verify?
<--- Score
88. Where is it measured?
<--- Score
89. What tests verify requirements?
<--- Score
90. Do you effectively measure and reward individual and team performance?
<--- Score
91.