Vegetable Teratology. Maxwell T. Masters
rel="nofollow" href="#ulink_530203f2-b497-53bf-a895-ba7813c5d060">[40] 'Journal Roy. Hort. Soc.,' new ser., vol. i. 1866, p. 200.
[41] 'Bull. Soc. Bot. Fr.,' 1861, p. 159.
[42] Ibid., 1859, p. 467.
[43] 'Flora,' 1858, p. 65, tab. ii.
[44] C. Morren. 'Bull. Acad. Belg.,' vol. xv (Fuchsia, p. 89); vol. xviii, p. 591. (Lobelia, p. 142); vol. xix, p. 352; vol. xx, p. 4.
[45] 'Bull. Soc. Bot. Fr.,' vol. vii, p. 625.
[46] Cramer, 'Bildungsabweichungen,' p. 56, tab. vii, fig. 10, figures a case wherein the two central flowers of the capitulum of Centaurea Jacea were united together.
[47] 'Bull. Bot.' tab. iii, figs. 4–6.
[48] 'Mém. greffe Ann. Science Nat.,' ser. i, t. xxiv, p. 334.
[49] "Mespilus portentosa." Poit. et Turp., 'Pomol. Franc.,' liv, xxxi, p. 202, pl. 202.
[50] Duchesne, 'Hist. Nat. Frais.,' p. 79.
[51] De Cand., 'Phys. Végét.,' tom. ii, p. 781.
[52] Sched. de monstr. plant. 'Act. Helv.,' tab. i, fig. 8.
[53] 'Mém. greffe,' loc. cit., tab. xxiv, p. 334.
[54] 'Bull. Soc. Bot. Franc.,' 8, pp. 73 and 351, tab. ii; and Röse. 'Bot. Zeit.,' x, p. 410.
[55] Nymphæa lutea, Æsculus Hippocastanum, &c. See Moquin, 'El. Ter. Veg.,' p. 277.
[56] C. Martins, 'Promenade Botanique,' p. 8.
[57] 'Ann. Sc. Nat.,' t. xix, 1843, p. 141, tab. iv.
[58] 'Ann. Nat. Hist.,' ser. 2, vol. ix, tab. xvi. 'Phytologist,' 1857. p. 352, &c.
[59] Quoted from the 'Revue Hortic.' in 'Gard. Chron.,' 1866, p. 386.
[60] Senebier, 'Phys Végét.,' t. iv, p. 426. The same author also cites Romer as having found two plants of Ranunculus, from the stem of which emerged a daisy. As it is not an uncommon practice to stick a daisy on a buttercup, it is to be hoped no hoax was played off on M. Romer.
[61] 'El. Ter. Veg.,' p. 289.
[62] An instance of this kind is cited in Dr. Robson's memoir of the late Charles Waterton, from which it appears that two trees, a spruce fir and an elm, were originally planted side by side, and had been annually twisted round each other, so that they had in places grown one into the other, with the result of stunting the growth of both trees, thus illustrating, according to the opinion of the eccentric naturalist above cited, the incongruous union of Church and State!
[63] See Daubeny, 'Lectures on Roman Husbandry,' p. 156.
[64] A. P. De Candolle, 'Organ Végét.,' t. ii, p. 72, tab. liv, fig. 1.
[65] 'Bull. Acad. Belg.,' t. xx, part i, 1852, p. 43.
PART II.
INDEPENDENCE OR SEPARATION OF ORGANS.
Under this head are included all those instances wherein organs usually entire, or more or less united, are, or appear to be, split or disunited. It thus includes such cases as the division of an ordinarily entire leaf into a lobed or partite one, as well as those characterised by the separation of organs usually joined together. Union, as has been stated in a previous chapter, is the result either of persistent integrity or of a junction of originally separate organs, after their formation; so in like manner, the separation or disjunction of parts may arise from the absence of that process of union which is habitual in some cases, or from an actual bonâ fide separation of parts originally united together. In the former case, the isolation of parts arises from arrest of development, while in the latter it is due rather to luxuriant growth. A knowledge, as well of the ordinary as of the unusual course, of development in any particular flower is thus required in order to ascertain with accuracy the true nature of the separation of parts. The late Professor Morren[66] proposed the general term Monosy (μονωσις) for all these cases of abnormal isolation, subdividing the group into two, as follows—1, Adesmy (α-δεσμος), including those cases where the separation is congenital; and 2, Dialysis (διαλυω), comprising those instances where the isolation is truly a result of the separation of parts previously joined together. Adesmy, moreover, was by the Belgian savant said to be homologous when it occurred between members of the same whorl, e.g. between the sepals of an ordinary monosepalous calyx, or heterologous when the separation took place between members of different whorls, as when the calyx is detached from the ovary, &c. The former case would thus be the converse of cohesion, the latter of adhesion.
To the adoption of these words there is this great objection, that we can but rarely, in the present state of our knowledge, tell in which group any particular illustration should be placed.
The terms adopted in the present work are, for the most part, not necessarily intended to convey any idea as to the organogenetic history of the parts affected. Where a single organ, that is usually entire, becomes divided the term Fission is used; in cases where parts of the same whorl become isolated, the word Dialysis is employed, and in the same sense in which it is generally used by descriptive botanists, and where the various whorls become detached one from the other, the occurrence is distinguished by the application of the term Solution.
FOOTNOTES:
[66] 'Bull. Acad. Belg.,' t. xix, part iii, 1852, p. 315.