Generalized Ordinary Differential Equations in Abstract Spaces and Applications. Группа авторов
rel="nofollow" href="#fb3_img_img_06cf990f-7319-5d6c-a2c4-6a1683f21a37.png" alt="h left-parenthesis t right-parenthesis equals Start 2 By 2 Matrix 1st Row 1st Column f left-parenthesis tau Subscript i Baseline right-parenthesis comma 2nd Column t element-of left-parenthesis t Subscript i minus 1 Baseline comma t Subscript i Baseline right-parenthesis comma i equals 1 comma 2 comma ellipsis comma StartAbsoluteValue d EndAbsoluteValue comma 2nd Row 1st Column f left-parenthesis t Subscript i Baseline right-parenthesis comma 2nd Column t equals t Subscript i Baseline comma i equals 0 comma 1 comma ellipsis comma StartAbsoluteValue d EndAbsoluteValue period EndMatrix"/>
Hence,
.The next result, borrowed from [7, Lemma 2.3], specifies the supremum of a function
.
Proposition 1.6: Let . Then where either , for some , or , for some , or for some .
Proof. Let
. Since , . By the definition of the supremum, for all , one can choose such that which impliesSince
, there exists a subsequence such that as . Since is regulated, belongs toThe composition of regulated functions may not be a regulated function as shown by the next example proposed by Dieudonné as an exercise. See, for instance, [58, Problem 2, p. 140].
Example 1.7: Consider, for instance, functions
The next result, borrowed from [209, Theorem 10.11], gives us an interesting property of left‐continuous regulated functions. Such result will be used in Chapters 8 and 11. We state it here without any proof.
Proposition 1.8: Let . If for every , there exists such that for every , we have , then
We end this first section by introducing some notation for certain spaces of regulated functions defined on unbounded intervals of the real line