A statesman who doesn’t exist yet. Remid. Аlmaz Braev
then any eyes the sons have are approved and accepted. Even if these sons steal, Rob and corrupt they jump high in a savage society. This is very good for all wild people. They will glorify the name of their father, the name of their village and the name of their family. And this is very important on the invisible rod, where everyone jumps sideways and sideways according to the same wild laws.
GLOSSARY
Zerefs are community people whose behavior conforms to stringent standards. Taboo, morality, law. Their reflection is zero; therefore their reflexes are rigidly set by the community, authorities, and law.
Remids are people of honor. Their reflection is average, and they are a conditional elite and conditional authority directing the members of the community – the zerefs.
Refags represent the highest form of reflection, that of tradespeople. Selfish reflection aimed at making profit from underdeveloped or traditional people.
CHAPTER V
HUMBLE HYPOCRITE
Against loop of remids (loop of remids -struggle remidov between themselves, after what ahead, option, in power it turns out zeref, a wild and strong-willed man)
After Lenin’s death.
Does this mean that if the power is lying on the road or a real candidate is experiencing difficulties, a less talented one will pick it up, as for example happened to the Bolsheviks after Lenin’s death?
For example, we take the attempt of Zinoviev, the Chairman of the Petrosovet, a member of the Politburo and Central Committee, and Kamenev, the Chairman of the Mossovet and head of the STO, to push aside the most talented in the Central Committee Trotsky, the Minister of war. After all, both knew that they would not pull responsibility and that their talents were lower than the LDT. Further, the party apparatus supported the even more inconspicuous and mediocre Stalin. In 1936, Stalin executed Kamenev and Zinoviev – the logical conclusion of the remids loop, when the most gifted come forward in the struggle of the most untalented. Then the most incompetent destroys them.
.
After Stalin’s death.
Beria was the most influential of the Soviet elite. But Malenkov and Khrushchev united against him, supported by Marshal Zhukov. Beria was shot. Malenkov was sure that the post of Chairman of the Council of Ministers was the main one (it was held once in the past by Lenin and Stalin). He recommended Stalin’s buffoon Khrushchev to lead the party. But he was very wrong. Who led the party, he was in charge of all.
Further.
In 1957, Stalin’s associates Molotov, Kaganovich, and Malenkov had already decided to remove Khrushchev. It is unlikely that Khrushchev was the most talented and the remids loop here looks more like a remids farce because all the participants are zeremids and provincials (all were born in the villages and rose thanks to the revolution of 1917 and the counter-revolution of 1937 by Stalin). The most talented of the Bureau of the Presidium of the Central Committee, Marshal Zhukov said: “I will appeal to the people, the people will support me!” (to crush you – Molotov, Kaganovich, Malenkov). For these words four months later Zhukov was accused of Bonapartism and dismissed as Minister of defense of the USSR.
The farce of choice.
When Khrushchev was dismissed no one wanted to come out on top. Everyone was afraid of Khrushchev’s reprisal. However when the support of the security forces was guaranteed, the hardware people agreed on the ridiculous figure of Brezhnev, who in the midst of Khrushchev’s struggle with Molotov, Kaganovich and Malenkov fainted at a meeting of the Bureau (almost like the elderly cardinal Jacques Dues, who was elected Pope in the hope that he would die immediately after the election. Dues during the Conclave portrayed himself all the time sick and dying at the Council of cardinals and they bought into this trick).
Finally, after the death of Andropov, 73-year-old Konstantin Chernenko was elected to the post of General Secretary and head of the USSR, “a diligent performer”, “never eager for power”, who from the very beginning of the Supreme Board was taken from his hospital bed, changed clothes and asked to read the prepared text. Isn’t this clear evidence of degradation and negative selection?!
Youth, not talent.
The most important argument when choosing the new leader of the USSR Gorbachev was not talent but only youth. Mikhail Gorbachev-the last leader of the USSR he is the son of a combine harvester. So much for the dictatorship of the proletariat! Where the most important thing was to be born somewhere in Siberia in the family of some slaughterer, locksmith or village blacksmith. As we can see the slogan of the dictatorship of the proletariat turned into a meme where the best was chosen from the worst. They chose from the majority of those who were more numerous in the country.
What are the conclusions?
Remids loop is a struggle of the elite and the self-destruction of the best rulers in the result of “bad parenting”, hope for the best, using the weakness of most worthy by reason of mandatory modesty. If the most worthy is not modest (for example, Trotsky), they will immediately begin to displace him, reproach him and finally completely exclude him from the list of candidates.
Further, this selection does not end. For in fact, it’s all the fault of tradition. It begins with modesty and ends with a majority vote. Those who are physically bigger are the ones who decide. And where physically more people were in the USSR? In traditional families. Do you remember the saying about a quiet heifer that sucks two cows? Choosing not the kindest leader, but the worst for leadership but modest and hurting the self-esteem of electors begins in the family. Within families. What kind of child do parents love? The sickest, weakest, most needy. Surprisingly, this family phenomenon of love, almost traditional goes from the bottom to the top-in the apparatus of the party and government, where they also love the weakest and sickest (remember the physically ill and infirm Leonid Brezhnev and Konstantin Chernenko, who were “loved” by the people).
How is this remids loop, which is actually an echo of tradition, overcome?
Of course, the choice of the leader of a worthy replacement. If the leader himself does not choose the best of his entourage, then the traditional people will choose the worst,” modest” hypocrite through their elite.
CHAPTER VI
NEGATIVE SELECTION
There is an opinion that under the autocracy and dictatorship of the party, the people do not decide anything.
Is this true?
This is an incorrect superficial opinion. And the very first question – where did this government and the autocrat come from? Well, they did not fall from the sky to this point of the earth, where the autocrat rules with his people. Not from the clouds, not from the moon.
These people are derivatives of popular choice, which does not happen officially, that is, directly, so that everyone can see how it happens in hypocritical democratic elections. This is an intimate, family choice, a choice made by every head of the family and his wife and children. No one tells your father at home, I voted for you, I chose you. Love the respect of outsiders don’t like unnecessary shouting. This is a cultural choice, a voluntary choice. We don’t choose our parents. If we chose as required by liberal guidelines the human race would have been suppressed even before the biblical times. We choose objectively, we choose by attraction.
But in one case, it’s good when it happens in the family. But how is it that on the street or in any public place we do not like our ruler? We love our father selflessly and selflessly, if of course he deserves it. Even if it doesn’t deserve it, the tradition and culture of the people obliges us to show respect. Even the most incompetent and clueless father. It is our