The United Nations Conspiracy to Destroy America. Michael Benson
Foundation, Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, and Rockefeller Brothers Fund.
As we’ve noted (Chapter “The Rose-Colored Glasses of Franklin Delano Roosevelt”), the theory that best fits the facts is that modern wars are controlled by bankers and businesspeople rather than by generals and armies. Members of the CFR first took an interest in Vietnam back in 1951, a full decade before U.S. involvement there. That year the CFR created a study group to analyze the region.
The group concluded that British-American domination of the region was recommended. Three years later, one of the founders of the CFR, John Foster Dulles, convened a conference in Manila at which the Southeast Asia Treaty Organization (SEATO) was founded. SEATO committed the British Empire, the United States, France, and the Philippines to defend Indochina, a pact that led to the French and then the U.S. fighting long and bloody wars in the region.
According to author Jim Marrs, the CFR roster during the 1960s, which included Robert McNamara, McGeorge Bundy, General Maxwell Taylor, and Henry Cabot Lodge, was a “who’s who of the Vietnam era.” In 1969, Richard Nixon appointed as his National Security Adviser Henry Kissinger, a member of both the CFR and the Trilateral Commission.
White-Collar War
Continuing with our theory that modern wars are run by men wearing white collars, they would find it desirable to make the wars as long and expensive as possible—yet undecisive. With that in mind, recall that MacArthur (a Mason) was fired by President Harry Truman when MacArthur sought to win the Korean War quickly and definitively. MacArthur was a very important chess piece and thought himself above the demands of the secret hand.
MacArthur was replaced by General Matthew B. Ridgeway, later a member of the CFR. U.S. military forces in Vietnam were never allowed to use the full brunt of their force against the enemy but were instead handcuffed by “rules of engagement,” which all but guaranteed a long and munition-consumptive war without a winner.
UN as Cover for War Profiteers
On the surface, the UN indeed maintained its utopian vision but there was no profit in a world without conflict. The trick was to keep the wars small and profitable without destroying the entire globe—and, indeed, during the nuclear age, the world seemed frighteningly fragile.
So, is it possible that the voices of anti-Western hatred are not the death of the UN, as the Nazis were for the League of Nations—but rather the irritants that make selling balm (and bombs) so profitable?
And isn’t it that very profiteering nature, engrained in the UN’s DNA by its father the Illuminati and its mother CFR, that allows the UN to grow so infested with corruption, negligence, and apathy?
Let’s take a closer look at those voices of dissension, starting with the leftist voices of hatred emanating from the Caribbean and Central and South America.
UNESCO: Pumping Up the Noise from the South
The UN, on all fronts, is anti-American right down to its fiber, but we’ll start with the “the noise from down south.” Much of the anti-Americanism came from the small but pesky Latin American countries that have given way to a leftist government, with one lunatic after another in charge.
That noise was composed of the jacked rhetoric of overstimulated banana republic dictators and functioned not only as propaganda but as a diversion. The clownish leftist hyperbole drew the world’s attention away from the real power of that Latin American leftist bloc.
And the bloc, this coven of self-proclaimed enemies of the United States, found cohesion in the halls of the UN. As we’ll see, the Commie Cacophony reached painful decibels in one of the UN’s oldest groups: the UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).
Attempt to Stifle the Press
Though the UNESCO’s stated purpose was to help developing nations with their education, society, and culture, their actual practices flew in the face of that raison d’etre.
During the early years of President Ronald Reagan’s administration, UNESCO tried to implement a plan that would require a license for all the world’s journalists—a license subject to revoke by some lording anti-American commission.
The notion, which carried the official title “New World Information and Communication Order,” called for a democratization of the world’s media and more egalitarian access to information.
The reality of the idea, however, drained the blood from the heads of those who believed in freedom of the press. Cloaked behind the fancy words was an attempt to create a global press through which Communist and Third World countries could air out their anti-American ramblings.
Brainchild of Communists
UNESCO was one of the UN’s oldest subsets, in fact it was almost as old as the UN itself. It was born on November 16, 1945, during the earliest days of the Cold War, the brainchild of communists like Alger Hiss.
UNESCO’s stated goals had initially to do with repairing the educational systems of war-torn nations. At one of the first UN meetings—when everything was still warm and fuzzy, propped up with the daydream of “world peace”—there were calls for a cultural and educational organization to embody a genuine culture of peace.
Holy MK-ULTRA!
MK-ULTRA was a CIA program’s code name for covert illegal human research, in other words: mind control, indoctrination, and brainwashing.
UNESCO was created to establish the “intellectual and moral solidarity of mankind.” Its function was not only to fund educational programs around the world, buy books, and train teachers but to “build peace in the minds of men.”
Some background: At the time of its creation, UNESCO had thirty-seven Member States. The ill-fated League of Nations also had a suborganization dedicated to the intellectualizing of the world. It was called the International Committee on Intellectual Cooperation. Albert Einstein was a member.
Anti-American from the Start
The squawking from American leaders about UNESCO increased proportionately during the 1950s with America squawking about communism in general. It was a time of acute awareness and a time when the Red Menace was thought to be everywhere and artists were blackballed for being antifacsist. This too was a diversion, probably unintentional, that allowed the actual Red Menace to soak deeper into the American sponge.
In 1955 Lawrence Smith, a Wisconsin congressman, called UNESCO a “permanent international snake pit where Godless Communism is given a daily forum for hate, recrimination, psychological warfare against freedom, and unrelenting moral aggression against peace.”
So by the time we got to the part of history where banana republics were looking to solidify their common interests, this was not a case of an old friend who later stabbed us in the back. UNESCO was anti-American from the get-go.
Scientific World Humanism
The first director general appointed to UNESCO was Julian Huxley, brother of Aldous Huxley. He said in his acceptance speech, “The general philosophy of UNESCO should be a scientific world humanism, global in extent…It can stress the transfer of full sovereignty from separate nations to a world political organization…. Political unification in some sort of world government will be required to help the emergence of a single world culture.”
In other words, the UN was seeking to organize the world much as the Soviet Union had, at that time, organized Eastern Europe.
Reagan Pulls Out
In 1984, as president, Ronald Reagan cited blatant anti-Americanism and hostility to freedom for pulling the United States out of UNESCO. Another unspoken reason was that UNESCO’s budget was bloating at a fearsome rate, and Reagan, of course, was trying to cut spending.
A review to determine if the United States should rejoin UNESCO was conducted in 1990 by the State Department. The review concluded that the U.S. should remain out because the price tag for membership was too big considering the way UNESCO was known to mismanage their funds.
Abhorrent