A Companion to Contemporary British and Irish Poetry, 1960 - 2015. Группа авторов

A Companion to Contemporary British and Irish Poetry, 1960 - 2015 - Группа авторов


Скачать книгу
Hamilton‐Emery started to commission single‐author collections once again, also inviting unsolicited British submissions: “Identity in publishing is important, perhaps critical in building your business, you can't understand Salt without its poetry, the building blocks of its success.” When defining his aims for the list, Hamilton‐Emery seems to have learnt his lesson. Although he wants “to provide opportunities for debuts [… and] take risks,” his focus is now “on the individual talents rather than any given poetics” (Hamilton‐Emery 2018). However, The Bookseller's recent article on “High Returns and Slow Sales Hit Salt with £15,000 Shortfall,” and Jennifer Hamilton‐Emery's announcement that they “need to recapitalise the business,” followed by the already (in)famous appeal to “our loyal readers to buy a book and help us climb out of the hole” (Chandler 2019) make the situation sound like Groundhog Day.

      Although Smokestack only received another five ACE grants (2006/7: £26,125; 2008/9: £17,891; 2010: £6,200; 2011: £8,300; 2012: £6,200; Croft 2019c), Croft has managed to publish more than 160 books since 2004. The lack of continuous financial support meant that Croft could no longer pay his authors a nominal fee of £500 after the final ACE grant in 2011. However, he also felt “a kind of liberation. I suddenly had much greater control over the budget, which was no longer dependent on funding decisions made elsewhere. And I don't have to justify my editorial decisions to anyone” (Croft 2019a). In 2018, Croft published 15 titles and the press, as Croft admits, “is pretty well self‐financing […]. So, as long as I never pay myself anything for running Smokestack it breaks even” (Croft 2019a). This situation may change because of very recent developments. Much to Croft's own surprise, one of his interventions—David Cain's Truth Street—was shortlisted in the 2019 Forward Best First Collection category and featured by The Guardian, a first for a Smokestack title (Croft 2019a,b, 33, Flood 2019). Croft was not overwhelmed, roundly declaring: “Of course the only reason that The Guardian are interested in Truth Street is that it has been shortlisted for one of the little Forward prizes. They rang me up to ask for a review copy when the shortlist was published, despite the fact that I had sent them a review copy several months earlier when the book came out” (Croft 2019d). As for the shortlisting itself, one of the reasons for it may have been the jury's sensitivity to the political dimension of things. Andrew McMillan, one of the jurors, declared that “a lot of these collections, especially from newer poets, are really getting down in the mud and wrestling with the intricacies and difficulties of our new political situation” (Flood 2019). McMillan's observation coincides with a trend that Donna Ferguson had, almost rhapsodically, described in The Guardian as a “passion for politics, particularly among teenagers and young millennials, [that] is fueling a dramatic growth in the popularity of poetry” (Ferguson 2019). Under these new circumstances, Croft may reconsider his plans to close Smokestack in 2021.

      In a way, it is unfortunate that we have to have a prize culture at all. But we do have to have it. Because we do, unfortunately, have to make a fuss to draw people's attention to the better work that's being produced.

      (Burnside 2016, 17)

      As early as 1989, Margaret Drabble had reflected on the literary prize system and the steady increase in the number of prizes, arguing that “poets more than any other category of writer need prizes and bursaries to keep aloft” (Drabble 1989, 251). Kathryn Gray in 2015 admits that prizes can be regarded as “a welcome opportunity to financially reward the purveyors of an art form who typically went largely unremunerated for their efforts” (Gray 2015, 8), but reminds “the children of prize culture” (Gray 2015, 8), whom she defines, appropriately, as “those of us in the mainstream,” that “the pragmatism of consensus” among the judging panels “limits individual


Скачать книгу